Publication details for Dr Matthew TugbyTugby, M. (2016). Universals, Laws, and Governance. Philosophical Studies 173(5): 1147-1163.
- Publication type: Journal Article
- ISSN/ISBN: 0031-8116 (print), 1573-0883 (electronic)
- DOI: 10.1007/s11098-015-0521-2
- Keywords: Laws, Dispositions, Universals, Platonism, Aristotelianism, Explanation.
- Further publication details on publisher web site
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
Proponents of the dispositional theory of properties typically claim that their view is not one that offers a realist, governing conception of laws. My first aim is to show that, contrary to this claim, if one commits to dispositionalism then one does not automatically give up on a robust, realist theory of laws. This is because dispositionalism can readily be developed within a Platonic framework of universals. Second, I argue that there are good reasons for realist dispositionalists to favour a Platonic view. This is because the alternative Aristotelian version of dispositionalism, on which universals are immanent entities, is unstable for various reasons. My final aim is to address a common criticism facing Platonic theories of laws, which is the problem of how external entities can play an explanatory role where the world’s law-like patterns of behaviour are concerned. I argue that the Platonists’ response to the one over many problem can help to shed light on this matter, and a possible solution is sketched, one which makes use of the notions of essence, constitution and ontological dependence.