Mind, Language and Metaphysics
The Mind, Language and Metaphysics research cluster is the largest group in the department and covers a broad range of key philosophical disciplines and philosophical methodologies.
Dr Clare Mac Cumhaill -Philosophy of perception
Dr AD Carruth - Medieval Philosopy, fundamental ontology and the metaphysics of causation, emergence
Professor Nancy Cartwright - causal inference, causal powers, scientific emergence and objectivity and evidence
Dr Matthew Daniel Eddy - cultural historian of the Enlightenment, history of science, art and gender in modern Europe
Dr. Sophie Gibb - Mental causation, categories of being, causation and laws
Dr. Andy Hamilton - Wittegenstein's Philosophy of Mind, in particular On Certainty; Freud; self-consciousness
Prof. Robin Hendry - Metaphysics and semantics of science (especially chemistry)
Prof. Wolfram Hinzen - Syntax and semantics, Kant, Chomsky
Dr Francis Olley Peason - Time, tense, and rationality
Dr Emily Thomas - History of metaphysics
Dr Matthew Tugby - Foundational metaphysics and metaphysics of science
Dr Sara Uckelman - Philosophy of language, esp. philosophy of fiction; Medieval philosophy, esp. logic/philosophy of language; informal argumentation; human and machine reasoning
Dr Peter Vickers - Metaphysics of science, eliminativism
Dr Rachael Wiseman - Dreaming, integrity, self consciousness and 'I', Wittgenstein, Anscombe, philosophy of action
View our Post-Graduate Members here
Recent Research Projects
ABSENCES, NOTHINGS, LACKS AND LIMITS (2016–2019)
Principle Investigator: Professor Stephen Mumford
We don’t know how to understand absences, non-existents, gaps, holes, limits and various nothingnesses. But nothing matters. Lack of water kills you. How does it do so if it is nothing at all? And how can a universe have been created from nothing? Are there negative properties, negative truths, perceptions of absence, omissions, non-existent particulars? Philosophers have tried to solve these problems by reifying nothingness: accepting it as part of reality. Using philosophical methods, and resulting in a major monograph to be called Nothing Really Matters, this project aims for a systematic and definitive resolution of the debate without treating nothing as if it were something.
This project is funded through a Leverhulme Major Research Fellowship.
TIME IN EARLY MODERN METAPHYSICS (2013–2017)
Principle Investigator: Dr. Emily Thomas
What is time? During the early modern period, a new answer emerged: time is ‘absolute’, in the sense it exists independently of human minds and material bodies. This thesis had a huge impact, affecting natural philosophy and theology, as well as existing metaphysics of change, freewill, personal identity, and idealism. However, existing scholarship focuses on early modern accounts of space, and neglects time. This project addresses that problem, providing a sustained study of the development of time in early modern British metaphysics. Along the way, it recovers the work of women philosophers who have traditionally been neglected in the histories of our discipline.
This project is funded by a Netherlands Research Council (NWO) Veni grant.
EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC REALISM: A NEW GENERATION OF HISTORICAL CASE STUDIES (2014–2018)
Principal Investigator: Peter Vickers
This project will make a step-change contribution to assessing the validity of selective scientific realism by amassing a large amount of relevant ‘data’ from the history of science, and bringing that data to bear upon selective scientific realist positions.
This project is funded by an AHRC Research Grant
Find out more ...
DURHAM EMERGENCE PROJECT (2013–2016)
Principle Investigator: Professor Robin Hendry
Emergence, or dependent novelty, is once again a major focus of interest in science and philosophy. In weak emergence, the novelty concerns knowledge of the world, or our description of it: emergence is unpredictability, or the applicability of new concepts. The existence of weak emergence is uncontroversial. Strong emergence is novelty in the world itself: new properties or objects, new laws or causal powers. In this project we propose to investigate philosophical and scientific characterisations of strong emergence, and carefully examine the scientific evidence for its existence.
This project was funded by a John Templeton Foundation Large Grant. It provided support for two post-doctoral research fellows and 2 phd students.
Find out more ...
UN-CARTESIAN LINGUISTICS (2009 - 2012)
Principle Investigator: Wolfram Hinzen
For 400 years a guiding philosophical intuition on the nature of language has been that language is a - more or less deficient - medium for expressing our thoughts. But thoughts as such are independent of language. Linguistic signs, which serve the purpose of expressing thought, are arbitrary and regulated by convention. This view is a decisive component of the general, or rational, grammars arising in the 17th century, which was taken up and updated in the Chomskyan project of generative (universal) grammar. This project argued that this early modern, Cartesian axiomatics is at the root of a number of theoretical and empirical impasses in current linguistic theory. It developed another, non-rationalist, conception of universal grammar.
This project was funded by an AHRC/DFG grant and supported five post-doctoral researchers and one phd researcher
Find out more ...
Rachael Wiseman - Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Anscombe's Intention
G. E. M. Anscombe’s Intention is a classic of twentieth-century philosophy. The work has been enormously influential despite being a dense and largely misunderstood text. It is a standard reference point for anyone engaging with philosophy of action and philosophy of psychology.
In this Routledge Philosophy GuideBook, Rachael Wiseman:
- situates Intention in relation to Anscombe’s moral philosophy and philosophy of mind
- considers the influence of Aquinas, Aristotle, Frege, and Wittgenstein on the method and content of Intentionadopts a structure for assessing the text that shows how Anscombe unifies the three aspects of the concept of intention
- considers the influence and implications of the piece whilst distinguishing it from subsequent work in the philosophy of action
Ideal for anyone wanting to understand and gain a perspective on Elizabeth Anscombe’s seminal work, this guide is an essential introduction, useful in the study of the philosophy of action, ethics, philosophy of psychology and related areas.
Matthew Tugby - Metaphysics and Science
Metaphysics and Science brings together important new work within an emerging philosophical discipline: the metaphysics of science. In the opening chapter, a definition of the metaphysics of science is offered, one which explains why the topics of laws, causation, natural kinds, and emergence are at the discipline's heart. The book is then divided into four sections, which group together papers from leading academics on each of those four topics. Among the questions discussed are: How are laws and measurement methods related? Can a satisfactory reductive account of laws be given? How can Lorentz transformation laws be explained? How are dispositions triggered? What role should dispositional properties play in our understanding of causation? Are natural kinds and natural properties distinct? How is the Kripke-Putnam semantics for natural kind terms related to the natural kind essentialist thesis? What would have to be the case for natural kind terms to have determinate reference? What bearing, if any, does nonlinearity in science have on the issue of metaphysical emergence? This collection will be of interest to philosophers, scientists and post-graduates working on problems at the intersection of metaphysics and science.