Publication details for Ms Ros RobertsRoberts, R. (2001). Procedural understanding in biology the 'thinking behind the doing'. Journal of biological education 35(3): 113-117.
- Publication type: Journal papers: academic
- ISSN/ISBN: 0021-9266
- Keywords: Procedural understanding, Biology investigations, Scientific evidence, Biological literacy, Concepts of evidence.
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
Procedural understanding should be taught to students for an understanding of the 'nature of science'. Considers some of the concepts of evidence that are particularly important to biology, and discusses how and why these ideas could be taught. (Contains 21 references.) (Author/YDS)
Blagg N, Bellinger M, and Gardner R (1988) The Somerset Thinking Skills Course. London, UK: Nigel Blagg Associates.
Goldsworthy A, Watson R, and Wood-Robinson V (1999) Investigations: Getting to grips with graphs. Hatfield, UK: ASE.
Goldsworthy A, Watson R, and Wood-Robinson V (2000) Investigations: Developing understanding. Hatfield, UK: ASE
Gott R and Duggan S (1995) Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Gott R and Johnson P (1999) Science in schools: time to pause for thought? School Science Review, 81, 21 – 28.
Gott R and Mashiter J (1991) Practical work in science – a task-based approach? In Practical Science, Woolnough BE (ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Gott R, Duggan S, and Johnson P (1999a) What do practising applied scientists do and what are the implications for science education? Journal of Research in Science and Technology Education, 17, 97 – 107.
Gott R, Foulds K, Johnson P, Jones M, and Roberts R (1997) Science Investigations 1. London, UK: Collins Educational.
Gott R, Foulds K, Jones M, Johnson P, and Roberts R (1998) Science Investigations 2. London, UK: Collins Educational.
Gott R, Foulds K, Roberts R, Jones M, and Johnson P (1999b) Science Investigations 3. London, UK: Collins Educational.
Harlen W (2000) Teaching, learning and assessing science 5 – 12 (3rd ed.) London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Harrison B (1998) Industrial links: purpose and practice. In ASE Guide to secondary science education, Ratcliffe M (ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.
Jones M and Gott R (1998) Cognitive acceleration through science education: alternative perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 755 – 768.
Jones M and Gott R (1999) Cognitive acceleration through science education: alternative perspectives II. University of Durham, UK. Internal paper.
NCC (1989) Science. Non-statutory guidance. York, UK: NCC.
Nott M and Wellington J (1999) The state we’re in: issues in KS3 and 4 science. School Science Review, 81, 13 – 18.
Reiss M J, Millar R, and Osborne J (1999) Beyond 2000: science/biology education for the future. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 68 – 70.
Roberts R and Gott R (1999) Procedural Understanding: Its place in the biology curriculum. School Science Review, 81, 19 – 25.
Roberts R and Gott R (2000) Procedural Understanding in Biology: how is it characterised in texts? School Science Review, 82, 83 – 91.
Tamir P, Stavy R, and Ratner N (1998) Teaching science by inquiry: assessment and learning. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 27 – 32.
Watson R, Goldsworthy A, and Wood-Robinson V (1999) What is not fair with investigations? School Science Review, 80, 101 – 106.