Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham University

Department of Geography

Departmental Research Projects

Publication details

Crang, M. Qualitative methods the new orthodoxy? Progress in human geography. 2002;26:647-655.

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

It is an interesting moment to write Progress in Human Geography’s first report on qualitative methods. In one sense, it suggests these methods have, at long last, arrived and been accepted as established approaches. That this is an overdue recognition needs little emphasizing when surveying the number of articles drawing upon, at least in
part, qualitative material. However, a less encouraging omen is the recent column in the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s Social Sciences, penned by the chief executive (Marshall, 2001). In it he asserts: ‘British universities and colleges are not producing quantitatively competent social scientists in sufficient numbers.’ Although he does not mention what ‘non-quantitative’ research is doing, he discusses a series of remedial measures – such as compulsory training in statistics, prioritized awards for
quantitative PhD projects, tied studentships and specialist research centres. To paraphrase Spike Milligan’s comment on army training, the attitude appears to be – if
someone dies when you hang them, keep hanging them until they get used to it. It is already feeding through into new postgraduate Research Training Guidelines. The problem we are told is acute, though the evidence presented is scant and, moreoever,
ironically seems to consist of unanalysed, qualitative reports from meetings with civil servants: ‘Failure to [remedy the shortage] is likely to result in Britain falling behind the
rest of Europe, both in the provision of talented quantitative social researchers, and the ability to design public policy on a reliable evidence base.’ It seems to imply that
qualitative research has not only arrived but gone too far. Within geography, the last decade has undoubtedly seen an expansion in qualitative work both in terms of the types of work and the topics addressed. So in this first report
I want to spend some time looking at the range of topics, then beginning to look at the range of methods that might be covered. I want to suggest that we have moved from a period when papers were prefaced with legitimations of qualitative work to a time when we are seeing debates within qualitative methods over establishing orthodox approaches and standards. I want to conclude this report by pointing towards some gaps

References

Agnes, P. 2000: The ‘end of geography’ in financial services? Local embeddedness and territorialisation in the interest rate swaps industry. Economic Geography 76, 347–66.
Bailey, C., White, C. and Pain, R. 1999: Evaluating qualitative research, dealing with the tensions between ‘science’ and ‘creativity’. Area 31, 169–83.
Banks, M. 2001: Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
Banks, M. and Morphy, H., editors 1999: Rethinking visual anthropology. Harvard: Yale University Press.
Baxter, J. and Eyles, J. 1997: Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 22, 505–25.
Beaverstock, J. and Boardwell, J. 2000: Negotiating globalization, transnational corporations and global city financial centres in transient migration studies. Applied Geography 20, 277–304.
Beazley, H. 1998: Subcultures of resistance: street children’s conception and use of space in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Tropical Geography 29, 11–22.
Becker, K. 2000: Picturing a field: relationships between visual culture and photographic practice in a fieldwork setting. In Anttonen, P., editor, Folklore, heritage politics and ethnic diversity, Botkyrka, Sweden: Multicultural Centre, 100–21.
Bennett, K. 2000: Inter/viewing and inter/subjectivities: powerful performances. In Hughes, A., Morris, C. and Seymour, S., editors, Ethnography and rural research, Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Press, 120–35.
Burgess, J. 1999: The genesis of in-depth discussion groups: a response to Liz Bondi. Professional Geographer 51, 458–60.
Cochrane, A. 1998: Illusions of power: interviewing local élites. Environment and Planning A 30, 2121–32.
Crang, M. 2000: Playing nymphs and swains in a pastoral idyll. In Hughes, A., Morris, C. and Seymour, S., editors, Ethnography and rural research, Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Press, 158–78.
Crang, M., Hinchliffe, S., Hudson, A. and Reimer, S. 1997: Software for qualitative research: 1 Prospectus and overview. Environment and Planning A 29, 771–87.
DeLyser, D. 1999: Authenticity on the ground: engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89, 602–32.
Elwood, S. and Martin, D. 2000: ‘Placing’ interviews: location and scales of power in qualitative research. Professional Geographer 52, 649–57.
Emmison, M. and Smith, P. 2000: Researching the visual: images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London: Sage.
Fielding, S. 2000: The importance of being Shaun: self-reflection and ethnography. In Hughes, A., Morris, C. and Seymour, S., editors, Ethnography and rural research, Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Press, 66–80.
Flowerdew, R. and Martin, D., editors 1997: Methods in human geography. London: Longman.
654 Qualitative methods Herbert, S. 2000: For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography 24, 550–68.
Herod, A. 1999: Reflections on interviewing foreign élites: praxis, positionality, validity and the cult of the insider. Geoforum 30, 313–27.
Hinchliffe, S., Hudson A., Crang, M. and Reimer, S. 1997: Software for qualitative research: some thoughts on aiding analysis. Environment and Planning A 29, 1109–24.
Holbrook, B. and Jackson, P. 1996: Shopping around: focus group research in North London. Area 28, 136–42.
Hopkins, J. 1998: Signs of the post-rural: marketing myths of a symbolic countryside. Geografiska Annaler 80 B, 65–81.
Hughes, A. 1999: Constructing economic geographies from corporate interviews: insights from a crosscountry comparison of retailer-supplier relationships. Geoforum 30, 363–74.
Ifekwunigwe, J. 1999: Scattered belongings: cultural paradoxes of ‘race’, nation and gender. London: Routledge.
Jacquemet, M. 1999: From the Atlas to the Alps: chronicle of a Moroccan migration. In Holston, J., editor, Cities and citizenship, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 242–53.
Johnston, R. 2000: On disciplinary history and textbooks: or where has spatial analysis gone? Australian Geographical Studies 38, 125–37.
Kitchin, R. and Tate, N. 2000: Conducting research into human geography: theory, methodology and practice. London: Prentice Hall.
Kneafsey, M. 2000: Changing roles and constructing identities: ethnography in the Celtic periphery. In Hughes, A., Morris, C. and Seymour, S., editors, Ethnography and rural research, Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Press, 52–65.
Laurier, E. 1999: Geographies of talk: ‘Max left a message for you’. Area 31, 36–45.
Lawson, V. 2000: Arguments within geographies of movement: the theoretical potential of migrants’ stories. Progress in Human Geography 24, 173–89.
Leslie, D. 1999: Consumer subjectivity, space and advertising research. Environment and Planning A 31, 1443–57.
Ley, D. 1999: Myths and meanings of immigration in the metropolis. Canadian Geographer 43, 2–18.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. 1981: Effective evaluation. San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass.
Marshall, G. 2001: Addressing a problem of capacity. Social Sciences 47, 1–2.
McDowell, L. 1998: Elites in the city of London: some methodological considerations. Environment and Planning A 30, 2133–46.
Miller, D., Jackson, P., Thrift, N., Holbrook, B. and Rowlands, M. 1998: Shopping, place and identity. London: Routledge.
Mullings, B. 1999: Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a crosscultural setting. Geoforum 30, 337–50.
Murphy, L. 2001: Exploring social interactions of backpackers. Annals of Tourism Research 28, 50–67.
Oinas, P. 1999: Voices and silences: the problem of access to embeddedness. Geoforum 30, 351–61.
O’Reilly, K. 2000: The British on the Costa Del Sol: transnational identities and local communities. London: Routledge.
Pain, R., Mowl, G. and Talbot, C. 2000: Difference and the negotiation of ‘old age’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18, 377–93.
Pink, S. 2001: Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research. London: Sage.
Raju, S., Atkins, P., Townsend, J. and Kumar, N. 2000: Atlas of women and men in India. London: International Books.
Revill, G. and Seymour, S. 2001: Telling stories: story telling as a textual strategy. In Hughes,
A., Morris, C. and Seymour, S., editors, Ethnography and rural research, Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Press, 136–57.
Rennie, D. 1998: Grounded theory methodology: the pressing need for a coherent logic of justification. Theory and Psychology 8, 101–19.
Rose, G. 1997: Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21, 305–20.
–––– 2001: Visual methodologies. London: Sage. Russell, C. 1999: Experimental ethnography: the work of film in the age of video. Durham: Duke University Press.
Shurmer-Smith, P. 1998: Becoming a memsahib: working with the Indian Administrative Service. Environment and Planning A 30, 2163–79.
Sidaway, J. 2000: Recontextualising positionality: geographical research and academic fields of power. Antipode 32, 260–70.
Thornton, S. 2000: An academic Alice in adland: ethnography and the commercial world. Critical Quarterly 41, 57–68.
Townsend, J. 1995: Women’s voices from the rainforest. London: Routledge.
Valentine, G. 1999: Doing household research: interviewing couples together and apart. Area
31, 67–74.
Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C., editors 2001: Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
Vereni, P. 2000: Os Ellen Makedonia: autobiography, memory and national identity in western Greek Macedonia. In Cowan, J., editor, Macedonia and the politics of identity and difference. London: Pluto Press, 47–67.
Wilton, R. 1999: Qualitative health research: negotiating life with HIV/AIDS. Professional Geographer 51, 254–64.
Winchester, H. 1999: Interviews and questionnaires as mixed methods in population
geography: the case of lone fathers in Newcastle, Australia. Professional Geographer
51, 60–67.
Woods, M. 1998: Rethinking élites: networks, spaces and local politics. Environment and
Planning A 30, 2101–20.
Willis, K. and Yeoh, B. 1998: The social sustainability of Singapore’s regionalisation drive.
Third World Planning Review 20, 203–21.

Notes

DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph392pr

Department of Geography