Skip to main content

Research Projects

 
A great deal of thinking goes on around the churches about the future of ministry and mission, and about the future of theological education. Some of that thinking is going on in formal projects or in groups or institutions dedicated to such exploration.

A Vision for Theological Education in the Common Awards 

There were serious discussions of principle during the creation of the Common Awards, some of which are reflected in the ‘Introduction’ and the 'Preface’ documents to the scheme (available upon request). The focus of the early development of the scheme was, however, necessarily on the development of a practical framework that could do justice to the existing expertise of the TEIs, the needs of the various churches involved, and the requirements of Durham University. That left open the question of whether the scheme was (or could be) accompanied by a fuller shared vision of the nature of theological education.  

In December 2014, the Church of England’s Ministry Division (now known as the National Ministry Team), assisted by the Durham Common Awards team, convened a working group, to consider whether any kind of answer to this question might be needed (and whether it might be possible), initially from an Anglican point of view. That group decided to initiate work towards a brief theological statement and to arrange wide consultation on it so that it could be owned by the whole ecumenical partnership. An initial draft produced by the group was then extensively revised in the light of feedback from staff and students from around the TEIs, from ecumenical partners, from a session at the Common Awards Annual Theological Educators Conferenceand another at the Society for the Study of Theologyfrom the Church of England’s College of Bishops, and from many others, before reaching final form in January 2016. 

The document is not intended to be comprehensive, nor to be permanent. It provides a snapshot of shared thinking from around the Common Awards partnership at a particular moment in time: a statement of theological principles that has secured very wide (though not universal - see critical discussion) agreement around the partnership at present, but which is open to future revision. 

A Vision for Theological Education in the Common Awards (pdf)

Members of the initial working group (roles as between 2014-2016) 

  • Peter Allen, Principal, College of the Resurrection, Mirfield 
  • John Applegate, Principal, All Saints Centre for Mission and Ministry 
  • Jonathan Clark, Bishop of Croydon 
  • Frances Clemson, Lecturer in Theology and Ministry, Durham University 
  • Stephen Conway, Bishop of Ely 
  • Stephen Croft, Bishop of Sheffield (Chair) 
  • Julie Gittoes, Residentiary Canon, Guildford Cathedral 
  • Mike Higton, Professor of Theology and Ministry, Durham University 
  • Emma Ineson, Principal, Trinity College, Bristol 
  • Jeremy Morris, Master, Trinity Hall, Cambridge 
  • Robin Ward, Principal, St Stephen’s House, Oxford 
  • Martin Warner, Bishop of Chichester 
  • David Way, Theological Education Secretary, Ministry Division 

Christian Doctrine

Doctrine after Christendom

Christian Doctrine and the Impact Agenda

In university departments and theological colleges and courses around the world, there’s a great deal of careful study of Christian doctrine. There are people thinking and arguing about the doctrine of the Trinity, or about the incarnation, or about the Holy Spirit, or about atonement, and asking how best to understand those doctrines, and how best to understand their implications.

What role could or should such study play in shaping the life of the church, or Christians’ involvement in the world around them? What should those who study Christian doctrine be doing, if they want their work to make a difference?

The ‘Doctrine after Christendom’ project emerged against the background of the UK government’s ‘Research Excellence Framework’, in which university departments around the country are asked to demonstrate (amongst other things) that the research they produce has ‘impact’ beyond the university. There has been a lot of vigorous debate about this demand across the university sector, especially about the difficulties of measuring real impact. We wanted to take a step back from those debates, however, and ask what good those of us who study Christian doctrine are doing, and what good could we be doing?

We gathered a small core group of theologians who, one way or another, work on Christian doctrine. And we then invited a range of people to come and talk to us: scholars who we know have been deeply engaged in work that does look like it has made a difference beyond the walls of the university; practitioners from the churches and elsewhere; people who straddle these boundaries.

Those of us who study doctrine – in different contexts, in different ways – tend to assume that such exploration of doctrine can or should be of service to the church, including in its interactions with the wider world. These symposia are designed to explore and test that assumption.

The project is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

Project reports

Project team

Full participant list

Richard Briggs, Paul Fiddes, David Goodhew, Tom Greggs, Rob Haynes, Mike Higotn, Bex Lewis, Nicholas Lombardo, Jolyon Mitchell, Jenny Moberly, Paul Murray, Rachel Muers, Paul Nimmo, Elizabeth Oldfield, Pete Phillips, Ben Quash, Marika Rose, Calvin Samuel, James Sweeney, Miranda Thelfall-Holmes, Medi Ann Volpe, Pete Ward.

Understanding and Christian Doctrine

A team based at Fordham University in New York received funding from the John Templeton Foundation to run a programme exploring the nature of understanding from psychological, philosophical and theological perspectives. We secured a project grant from the programme’s theology strand, to explore the relationship between understanding and Christian doctrine.

Two influential strands of contemporary theology focus on the ways in which Christian doctrines guide Christian religious practice, and on the ways in which Christian religious practice shapes Christians’ ways of looking at and thinking about God and God’s world. In one strand, the emphasis falls on the way in which doctrine guides Christian spiritual or contemplative practices; in the other, the emphasis falls on the way in which doctrine guides the whole weave of everyday practice in Christian communities. We drew on both these strands, exploring their implications for our understanding of understanding.

The Project was based in the Department of Theology and Religion in Durham, but also involve engagement with doctrine teachers from the wider Common Awards partnership.

Project Team

·         Professor Mike Higton (Project Leader)

·         Professor Chris Cook

·         Professor Karen Kilby

·         Professor Gerard Loughlin

·         Professor Walter Moberly

·         Professor Robert Song

Event Reports

1.    God, Sexuality and the Self and the Method of Théologie Totale - Sarah Coakley, University of Cambridge (Tuesday 4th November 2014, 2:00-3:30pm)

2.    A New Apophaticism - Susannah Ticciati, King's College London (Tuesday 17th February 2015, 2:00-3:30pm – Tristram Room, St John’s College)

3.    Teaching Doctrine at The Queens Foundation for Ecumenical Theology in Birmingham – Richard Sudworth and Ashley Cocksworth, Queen’s Foundation, Birmingham (Tuesday 24th March 2015, 1:30-3:00pm – Tristram Room, St John's College)

4.    What is it for Faith to Seek Understanding? – Andrew Moore, University of Oxford (Tuesday 21st April 2015, 2:00-3:30pm – Seminar Room B, Theology Department)

5.    Religious Education in British Schools and the 'Christianity Project' – Hazel Henson, VA primary Headteacher in Derby diocese, and Dean Wearmouth, Head of RS at Immanuel College Bradford (Tuesday 26th May 2015, 2:00pm-3:30pm – Seminar Room B, Theology Department)

A video of Prof. Mike Higton's presentation at the Varieties of Understanding Midpoint Conference in New York, in June 2015, is available at Understanding and Christian Doctrine - Varieties of Understanding : Fordham Digital Collections.