Staff profile

• Psychology of reasoning

Chapter in book

• Over, D. The development of the new paradigm in the psychology of reasoning. In S. Elqayam, I. Douven, J. S. B. Evans, & N. Cruz (Eds.), Logic and uncertainty in the human mind: A tribute to David E. Over. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111902
• Cruz, N., & Over, D. E. (2023). Independence Conditionals. In S. Kaufmann, D. E. Over, & G. Sharma (Eds.), Conditionals: Logic, Linguistics and Psychology (223-233). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_8
• Over, D. E., & Cruz, N. (2023). Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals in the Psychology of Reasoning. In S. Kaufmann, D. E. Over, & G. Sharma (Eds.), . Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_6

Journal Article

• Sanfilippo, G., Gilio, A., Over, D. E., & Pfeifer, N. (in press). Probabilities of conditionals and previsions of iterated conditionals. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning: Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.03.001
• Wang, M., Over, D., & Liang, L. (2022). What is required for the truth of a general conditional?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(11), https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221089331
• Baratgin, J., Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Takahashi, T. (2018). The Psychology of Uncertainty and Three-Valued Truth Tables. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01479
• Nakamura, H., Shao, J., Baratgin, J., Over, D. E., Takahashi, T., & Yama, H. (2018). Understanding Conditionals in the East: A Replication Study of Politzer et al. (2010) With Easterners. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00505
• Sanfilippo, G., Pfeifer, N., Over, D., & Gilio, A. (2018). Probabilistic inferences from conjoined to iterated conditionals. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning: Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems, 93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.027
• Elqayam, S., Wilkinson, M. R., Thompson, V. A., Over, D. E., & Evans, J. S. B. (2017). Utilitarian Moral Judgment Exclusively Coheres with Inference from Is to Ought. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01042
• Evans, J. S. B., Thompson, V., & Over, D. (2015). Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00398
• Cruz, N., Baratgin, J., Oaksford, M., & Over, D. (2015). Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00192
• van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J., Elqayam, S., & Over, D. (2015). The probability of iterated conditionals. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 39(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12169
• Singmann, H., Klauer, C., & Over, D. (2014). New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00316
• Over, D., Douven, I., & Verbrugge, S. (2013). Scope ambiguities and conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning, 19(3-4), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.810172
• Deduction and induction are still distinct. Thinking and Reasoning, 19(3-4), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.745450
• introduction to the special issue edited by Elqayam, Bonnefon, and Over. Thinking and Reasoning, 19(3-4), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.841591
• tables. Thinking and Reasoning, 19(3-4), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.809018
• from disjunctions: A probabilistic study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(2), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.02.006
• Over, D. (2009). New paradigm psychology of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 15(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903266188
• Over, D., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J., Handley, S., & Sloman, S. (2007). The probability of causal conditionals. Cognitive Psychology, 54(1), 62-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002
• Evans, J., Over, D., & Handley, S. (2005). Suppositions, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002). Psychological Review, 112(4), 1040-1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.1040
• Over, D., Manktelow, K., & Hadjichristidis, C. (2004). Conditions for the acceptance of deontic conditionals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 96-105
• Over, D., & Evans, J. (2003). The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence. Mind and Language, 18(4), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00231
• Dudley, R., & Over, D. (2003). People with delusions jump to conclusions: A theoretical account ofresearch findings on the reasoning of people with delusions. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10(5), 263-274
• Evans, J., Handley, S., & Over, D. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.321
• Evans, J., Handley, S., Over, D., & Perham, N. (2002). Background beliefs in Bayesian inference. Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 179-190
• Evans, J., Handley, S., Perham, N., Over, D., & Thompson, V. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition, 77(3), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277%2800%2900098-6
• Dudley, R., John, C., Young, A., & Over, D. (1997). The effect of self-referent material on the reasoning of people with delusions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 36(4), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01262.x
• Evans, J., & Over, D. (1997). Are people rational? Yes, no and sometimes. Psychologist (Leicester), 10(9), 403-406