We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham University



Publication details for Professor Amanda Ellison

Ellison, A., Schindler, I., Pattison, L. L. & Milner, A. D. (2004). An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain 127(10): 2307-2315.

Author(s) from Durham


This study sought to investigate the recent claim by H.-O. Karnath and his colleagues that the crucial locus of neurological damage in neglect patients lies in the right superior temporal gyrus (STG), and not in the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as conventionally thought. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we first tested the involvement of the right STG in a task commonly used in the diagnosis of neglect, the landmark task. No evidence was found for a critical involvement of the right STG in the processing of this task, though evidence was found for the involvement of the right PPC. In contrast, however, when we examined the effects of TMS on exploratory search, a double dissociation between right STG and right PPC was found. When the processing of conjunction items was required, involvement of the right PPC (and not STG) was found in accordance with our previous research. When a difficult exploratory search through feature items was required, however, the right STG (not PPC) was found to be involved. A hitherto unknown role for right STG in visual search tasks was thus uncovered. These data suggest that conclusions about the area of brain damage resulting in neglect-like symptoms are highly dependent on the task used to diagnose them, with lesions in right PPC leading to deficits on the landmark task and conjunction visual search, and lesions in right STG resulting in deficits in feature based serial exploratory search tasks.


Ashbridge E, Walsh V, Cowey A. Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1221–89.

Behrmann M, Tipper SP. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1999; 25: 83–101.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE, Barton, JJS. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1445–58.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Behrmann M, Ebert P, Black SE. Hemispatial neglect and visual search: a large scale analysis. Cortex 2004; 40: 247–63.[ISI][Medline]

Binder J, Marshall R, Lazar R, Benjamin J, Mohr JP. Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 1187–94.[Abstract]

Bisiach E, Vallar G. Unilateral neglect in humans. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p. 459–502.

Bisiach E, Ricci R, Lualdi M, Colombo MR. Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the Milner landmark task. Brain Cogn 1998; 37: 369–86.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V. Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 2002; 125: 2012–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Shulman GL, Petersen SE. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 1202–26.[Abstract]

Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, Drury HA, et al. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 1998; 21: 761–73.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Driver, J. Object-based and egocentric visual neglect. In: Burgess N, Jeffery K, O'Keefe J, editors. The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 67–89.

Driver J, Baylis GC, Goodrich SJ, Rafal RD. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 1353–65.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Ellison A, Rushworth MFS, Walsh V. Visual search and posterior parietal cortex: a visuomotor hypothesis. In: Paulus W, Tergau F, Nitsche MA, Rothwell JC, Ziemann U, Hallett M, editors. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 56. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. p. 321–30.

Ferber S, Karnath HO. How to assess spatial neglect—line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001; 23: 599–607.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fierro B, Brighina F, Filippo B, Oliveri M, Piazza A, La Bua V, Buffa D, et al. Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 1519–21.[ISI][Medline]

Fink GR, Marshall JC, Shah NJ, Weiss PH, Halligan PW, Grosse-Ruyken M, et al. Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 2000; 54: 1324–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Zilles K. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 559–67.[CrossRef]

Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 1992; 28: 525–35.[ISI][Medline]

Hayakawa T, Miyauchi S, Fujimaki N, Kato M, Yagi A. Information flow related to visual search assessed during magnetoencephalography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 15: 285–95.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30: 327–30.[Abstract]

Hornak J. Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 547–52.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ, Quinlan PT, Price CJ, Donnelly N. Parallel pattern processing in visual agnosia. Can J Psychol 1992a; 46: 377–416.[ISI][Medline]

Humphreys GW, Freeman TA, Muller HJ. Lesioning a connectionist model of visual search: selective effects on distractor grouping. Can J Psychol 1992b; 46: 417–60.[ISI][Medline]

Hmoniemi RJ, Vintanen J, Ruohonen J, Karho J, Aronen HJ, Naatanen R, et al. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 3537–40.[ISI][Medline]

Karnath HO. Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997; 352: 1411–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Karnath HO, Himmelbach M. Strategies of lesion localisation. Cortex 2002; 38: 258–60.[ISI]

Karnath HO, Niemeier M. Task-dependent differences in the exploratory behaviour of patients with spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 1577–85.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Karnath HO, Niemeier M, Dichgans J. Space exploration in neglect. Brain 1998; 121: 2357–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karnath HO, Ferber S, Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 2001; 411: 950–3.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Karnath HO, Fruhmann Berger M, Zopf R, Küker W. Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004; 127: E10.[Free Full Text]

Leibovitch FS, Black SE, Caldwell CB, Ebert PL, Ehrlich LE, Szalai JP. Brain-behaviour correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: the Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Neurology 1998; 50: 901–8.[Abstract]

Luria AR. Restoration of function after brain injury. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1963.

Marshall JC, Fink GR, Halligan PW, Vallar G. Spatial awareness: a function of the posterior parietal lobe? Cortex 2002; 38: 253–7.[ISI][Medline]

Milner AD, Brechmann M, Pagliarini L. To halve and to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 515–26.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Milner AD, Harvey M, Roberts RC, Forster SV. Line bisection errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia 1993; 31: 39–49.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Milner AD, Harvey M, Pritchard CL. Visual size processing in spatial neglect. Exp Brain Res 1998; 123: 192–200.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C, et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003; 126: 1986–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Pambakian A, Kennard C, Husain M. Reply to: Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004; 127: E11.[Free Full Text]

Nikulin VV, Kicic D, Kahkonen S, Ilmoniemi RJ. Modulation of electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence for changes in cortical excitability related to movement. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 18: 1206–12.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Nobre AC, Sebestyen GN, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD. Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain 1997; 120: 515–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nobre AC, Coull JT, Walsh V, Frith CD. Brain activations during visual search: contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 91–103.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Pascual-Leone A, Gomez-Tortosa E, Grafman J, Alway D, Nichelli P, Hallett M. Induction of visual extinction by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe. Neurology 1994; 44: 494–8.[Abstract]

Robertson IH. Cognitive rehabilitation: attention and neglect. Trends Cogn Sci 1999; 3: 385–93.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Robertson IH, Marshall JC. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993.

Stewart LM, Ellison A, Walsh V, Cowey A. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in studies of vision, attention and cognition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2001; 107: 275–91.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tipper SP, Behrmann M. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996; 22: 1261–78.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 1980; 12: 97–136.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Vallar G. Extrapersonal visual neglect and its neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 52–8[CrossRef]

Vallar G, Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions: a clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 609–22.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Walker R, Husain M, Hodgson TL, Harrison J, Kennard C. Saccadic eye movement and working memory deficits following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 1141–59.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Walsh V, Cowey A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000; 1: 73–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Walsh V, Ellison A, Battelli L, Cowey A. Task-specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998; 265: 537–43.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Wasserman EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108: 1–16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Contact Us

Ask us online