Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham University

Department of Engineering

Staff Profile

Publication details for Professor Jun Jie Wu

Buckley, C.P., Wu, J.J. & Haughie, D.W. (2006). The integrity of welded interfaces in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: Part 1 Model. Biomaterials 27(17): 3178-3186.

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

The difficulty of eradicating memory of powder–particle interfaces in UHMWPE for bearing surfaces for hip and knee replacements is well-known, and ‘fusion defects’ have been implicated frequently in joint failures. During processing the polymer is formed into solid directly from the reactor powder, under pressure and at temperatures above the melting point, and two types of inter-particle defect occur: Type 1 (consolidation-deficient) and Type 2 (diffusion-deficient). To gain quantitative information on the extent of the problem, the formation of macroscopic butt welds in this material was studied, by (1) modelling the process and (2) measuring experimentally the resultant evolution of interface toughness. This paper reports on the model. A quantitative measure of interface structural integrity is defined, and related to the “maximum reptated molecular weight” introduced previously. The model assumes an idealised surface topography. It is used to calculate the evolution of interface integrity during welding, for given values of temperature, pressure, and parameters describing the surfaces, and a given molar mass distribution. Only four material properties are needed for the calculation; all of them available for polyethylene. The model shows that, for UHMWPE typically employed in knee transplants, the rate of eradication of Type 1 defects is highly sensitive to surface topography, process temperature and pressure. Also, even if Type 1 defects are prevented, Type 2 defects heal extremely slowly. They must be an intrinsic feature of UHMWPE for all reasonable forming conditions, and products and forming processes should be designed accordingly.

References

1

Wrona M, Mayor M, Collier J, Jensen R. The correlation between
fusion defects and damage in tibial polyethylene bearings. Clin
Orthopaed Rel Res 1994;299:9–103.

2

Rose RM, Cimino WR, Ellis E, Crugnola AN. Exploratory
investigation on the structure dependence of the wear resistance of
polyethylene. Wear 1982;77:89–104.

3

Landy MM, Walker PS. Wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight
polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty
1988;3(Suppl):S73–85.

4

Gul RM, McGarry FJ. Processing of ultra-high molecular weight
polyethylene by hot isostatic pressing, and the effects of processing
parameters on its microstructure. Polym Eng Sci 2004;44:1848–57.

5

Bragdon CR, Jasty M, Elder J, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. Types of
fusion defects in UHMWPE polyethylene and their role in wear in
vivo. In: 42nd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society,
Atlanta, 1996.

6

James SP, Lee KR, Beauregard GP, Rentfrow ED, McLaughlin JR.
Clinical wear of 63 ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene
acetabular components: effect of starting resin and forming method.
J Biomed Mater Res 1999;B48:374–84.

7

Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE.
Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented
tibial knee components. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1991;273:232–42.

8

Li S, Burstein AH. Current concepts review: ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76-A:1080–90.

9

Olley RH, Hosier IL, Bassett DC, Smith NG. On morphology of
consolidated UHMWPE resin in hip cups. Biomaterials 1999;20:
2037–46.

10

Connelly GM, Rimnac CM, Wright TM, Hertzberg RW, Manson
JA. Fatigue crack propagation behaviour of ultrahigh molecular
weight polyethylene. J Orthop Res 1984;2:119–25.

11

Rose RM, Crugnola A, Ries M, Cimino WR, Paul I, Radin EL. On
the origins of high in vivo wear rates in polyethylene components of
total joint prostheses. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1979;145:277–86.

12

Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, Lidgren L, Lilley P, Ryd L, et al.
Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty
1997;12:281–90.

13

Walker PS, Blunn GW, Lilley PA. Wear testing of materials and
surfaces for total knee replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;B33:
159–75.

14

Kelly PA, O’Connor JJ. Why incongruous knee replacements do not
fail early. J Biomech 2001;34:1599–605.

15

Gul RM, McGarry FJ, Bragdon CR, Muratoglu OK, Harris WH.
Effect of consolidation on adhesive and abrasive wear of ultra high
molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 2003;24:3193–9.

16

Oonishi H, Tsuji E, Kim YY. Retrieved total hip prostheses. Part I.
The effects of cup thickness, head sizes and fusion defects on wear.
J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1998;9:393–401.

17

Kurtz SM, Muratoglu OK, Evans M, Edidin AA. Advances in the
processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials
1999;20:1659–88.

18

Wu JJ, Buckley CP, O’Connor JJ. The origin of fusion defects in
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for joint replacement
prostheses. J Mater Sci Lett 2001;20:473–5.

19

Wu JJ, Buckley CP, O’Connor JJ. Mechanical integrity of compression-
moulded ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: effects of
varying process conditions. Biomaterials 2002;23:3773–83.

20

Haughie DW, Buckley CP, Wu JJ. The integrity of welded interfaces
in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: Part 2—Measurements
of interface toughness. submitted to Biomaterials 2006.

21

Mark H. Molecular structure and mechanical properties of high
polymers—a review. Am J Phys 1945;13:207–14.

22

Haward RN. The strength of plastics and glass. London: Cleaver-
Hulme Press; 1949.

23

Vincent PI. The tough-brittle transition in thermoplastics. Polymer
1960;1:425–44.

24

Gent AN, Thomas AG. Effect of molecular weight on the tensile
strength of glassy plastics. J Polym Sci, A-2 Polym Phys 1972;10:
571–3.

25

Turner DT. Tensile strength elevation of brittle polymers by
entanglements. Polymer 1982;23:626–9.

26

Huang Y- L, Brown N. The effect of molecular weight on slow crack
growth in linear polyethylene homopolymers. J Mater Sci 1988;23:
3648–55.

27

Sauer JA, Foden E, Morrow DR. Influence of molecular weight on
fatigue behaviour of polyethylene and polystyrene. Polym Eng Sci
1977;17:246–50.

28

Ramsteiner F. Failure of polymers by rupture versus disentanglement
of molecules. In: Moore DR, editor. The application of fracture
mechanics to polymers. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004. p. 31–7.

29

Tervoort TA, Visjager J, Smith P. On abrasive wear of polyethylene.
Macromolecules 2002;35:8467–71.

30

Ferry JD. Viscoelastic properties of polymers. 3rd ed. New York:
Wiley; 1980.

31

Wool RP. Polymer interfaces: structure and strength. Munich:
Hanser Publishers; 1995.

32

Wool RP, O’Connor KM. A theory of crack healing in polymers.
J Appl Phys 1981;52:5953–63.

33

Wool RP, Yuan B- L, McGarel OJ. Welding of polymer interfaces.
Polym Eng Sci 1989;29:1340–67.

34

Gao P, Mackley MR. The structure and rheology of molten ultrahigh-
molecular mass polyethylene. Polymer 1994;35:5210–6.

35

Shenoy AV, Saini DR. Compression moulding of ultra high
molecular weight polyethylene. Plastics Rubber Process Appl 1985;5:
313–7.

36

Scott JR. Theory and application of the parallel-plate plastimeter.
Trans IRI 1931;7:169–86.

37

Mackley MR, Spitteler PHJ. Experimental observations on the
pressure-dependent polymer melt rheology of linear low density
polyethylene, using a multi-pass rheometer. Rheol Acta 1996;35:
202–9.

38

Sedlacek T, Zatloukal M, Filip P, Boldizar A, Saha P. On the effect
of pressure on the shear and elongational viscosities of polymer melts.
Polym Eng Sci 2004;44:1328–36.

39

Farrar DF, Brain AA. The microstructure of ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene used in total joint replacements. Biomaterials
1997;18:1677–85.

40

Doi M, Edwards SF. The theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford:
Clarendon Press; 1986.

41

Klein J, Briscoe BJ. The diffusion of long-chain molecules through
bulk polyethylene. Proc R Soc A 1979;365:53–73.

42

Wu JJ, Buckley CP, O’Connor JJ. Processing of ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene: modelling the decay of fusion defects. Trans Inst
Chem Eng Part A 2002;80:423–31.

43

Bartels CR, Crist B, Graessley WW. Self-diffusion coefficient in melts
of linear polymers: chain length and temperature dependence for
hydrogenated polybutadiene. Macromolecules 1984;17:2702–8.