Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham University

Department of Earth Sciences

Profile

Publication details for Professor Richard Hobbs

Drummond, B.J, Hobbs, R.W & Goleby, B.R (2004). The effects of out-of-plane seismic energy on reflections in crustal-scale 2D seismic sections. Tectonophysics 388(1-4): 213-224.

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

Crustal-scale seismic surveys mostly collect data along single profiles, and the data processing has an underlying assumption that the data have imaged two-dimension (2D) structure striking at right angles to the seismic profile. However, even small amounts of out-of-plane topography on a reflector can result in reflections that do not map the reflector shape accurately. Out-of-plane energy will migrate within the plane of the section to an apparent depth (represented as two-way-time, TWT) that is greater than the depth of the reflection point out of the plane of the section. It will fall within the plane of the section at depths less than, equal to or greater than the intersection of the reflector with the plane of the section, depending on both the amount of out-of-plane topographic relief on the reflector, and the offset of the topographic relief from the plane of the section. Reflectors that are a single surface can therefore be manifested in the seismic section as a band of several reflections, rather than a single reflection. More complex reflectors, such as shear zones that have a finite thickness because they are made up of several to many anastomosing layers of altered and anisotropic rock embedded in protolith, will appear as laterally short reflections within a laterally continuous reflection band. Other examples of such reflectors would be the Moho in some places, and rock with compositional layering. With increasing out-of-plane topographic relief on the reflector, the top of the reflection band for both single- and multi-layer reflectors will be a poor indicator of the top of the reflector in the Earth. The bottom of the reflection band will always be a poor indicator of the bottom of the reflector. Because out-of-plane energy can arrive at TWTs that are different from those of the reflector in the plane of the section, out-of-plane energy has the potential to interfere constructively or destructively with the in-plane energy. In synthetic data calculated for a simple model assuming one layer and topographic relief of 250 m over wavelengths of 4–5 km, similar to that imaged in a real sub-horizontal detachment, amplitudes ranged up to 2.6 times the expected amplitude for the layer. A model with anastomosing layers built to resemble a thick shear zone rather than a discrete fault surface allowed tuning between layers. The effects of out-of-plane energy when combined with the effects of tuning caused amplitudes up to 3.1 times those expected. Larger amplitudes could be achieved if a suitable model was contrived. The results indicate that care must be taken when calculating impedance contrasts using real data. The highest amplitude reflections are likely to yield overestimates of the true impedance contrast.

References

Brown, L.D., Zhao,W., Nelson, K.D., Hauck, M., Alsdorf, D., Ross,
A., Cogan, M., Clark, M., Liu, X., Che, J., 1996. Bright spots,
structure, and magmatism in Southern Tibet from INDEPTH
seismic reflection profiling. Science 274, 1688– 1690.
Cohen, J.C., Bleistein, N., 1983. The influence of out-of-plane
surface properties on unmigrated seismic sections. Geophysics
48, 125–132.
Etheridge, M.A., Vernon, R.H., 1983. Seismic velocity and
anisotropy in mylonites and the reflectivity of deep crustal fault
zones; discussion. Geology 11, 487–489.
Ferguson, J., Arculus, R.J., Joyce, J., 1979. Kimberlite and
kimberlitic intrusives of southeastern Australia: a review.
BMR J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 4, 227– 241.
Fuchs, K., 1969. On the properties of deep crustal reflectors.
Z. Geophys. 35, 133– 149.
Ganchin, Y.V., Smithson, S.B., Morozov, I.B., Smythe, D.K.,
Garipov, V.Z., Karev, N.A., Kristofferson, Y., 1998. Seismic
studies around the Kola Superdeep Borehole, Russia. Tectonophysics
288, 1 – 16.
Goleby, B.R., Shaw, R.D., Wright, C., Kennett, B.L.N., Lambeck,
K., 1989. Geophysical evidence for dthick-skinnedT crustal
deformation in central Australia. Nature 337, 325– 330.
Goleby, B.R., Korsch, R.J., Fomin, T., Bell, B., Nicoll, M.G.,
Drummond, B.J., Owen, A.J., 2002. Preliminary 3-D geological
model of the Kalgoorlie region, Yilgarn Craton, Western
Australia, based on deep seismic-reflection and potential-field
data. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 49, 917–933.
Griffin, W.L., O’Reilly, S.Y., 1987. The composition of the lower
crust and the nature of the continental Moho. In: Nixon, P.H.
(Ed.), Mantle Xenoliths. Wiley, London, pp. 413– 430.
Hobbs, R.W., Drummond, B.J., Goleby, B.R., 2005. The effects of
three dimensional shear zone morphology on the nature of
reflections in two dimensional crustal seismic sections. Geophys.
J. Int. (submitted for publication).
Jones, T.D., Nur, A., 1982. Seismic velocity and anisotropy in
mylonites and the reflectivity of deep crustal fault zones.
Geology 10, 260–263.
Jones, T.D., Nur, A., 1984. The nature of seismic reflections from
deep crustal fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 3153– 3171.
Klemperer, S.L., and the BIRPS Group, 1987. Reflectivity of the
crystalline crust: hypotheses and tests. Geophys. J. R. Astron.
Soc. 89, 217– 222.
Makovsky, Y., Klemperer, S.L., 1999. Measuring the seismic
properties of Tibetan bright spots: evidence for free aqueous
fluids in the Tibetan middle crust. J. Geophys. Res. 104,
10795– 10825.
Mandler, H.A.F., Clowes, R.M., 1998. The HIS reflector: further
evidence for extensive magmatism in the Precambrian of
western Canada. Tectonophysics 288, 71– 81.
Matthews, D.H., Cheadle, M.J., 1986. Deep reflections from the
Caledonides and Variscides west of Britain and comparison with
the Himalayas. In: Barazangi, M., Brown, L. (Eds.), Reflection
Seismology: A Global Perspective. AGU, Geodynamics Series,
vol. 13, pp. 5 – 19.
Mooney, W.D., Meissner, R., 1992. Multi-genetic origin of crustal
reflectivity: a review of seismic reflection profiling of the
continental lower crust and Moho. In: Fountain, D.M., Arculus,
R., Kay, R.W. (Eds.), Continental Lower Crust. Developments
in Geotectonics, vol. 23, pp. 45– 79.
Mosegaard, K., Singh, S.C., Snyder, D.B., Wagner, H., 1997. Monte
Carlo analysis of seismic reflections from the Moho and the Wreflector.
J. Geophys. Res. 102, 2983–2997.
Spaargaren, B., Warner, M., 1991. Constructive interference—
geophysical mythology re-examined. In: Meissner, R., Brown,
L., Dqrbaum, H.-J., Franke, W., Fuchs, K., Seifert, F. (Eds.),
Continental Lithosphere: Deep Seismic Reflections. AGU,
Geodynamics Series, vol. 22, pp. 359– 362.
Swager, C.P., Goleby, B.R., Drummond, B.J., Rattenbury, M.S.,
Williams, P.R., 1997. Crustal structure of granite–greenstone
terranes in the Eastern Goldfields, Yilgarn Craton, as
revealed by seismic reflection profiling. Precambrian Res. 83
(1–3), 43–56.
Wass, S.Y., Hollis, J.D., 1983. Crustal growth in south-eastern
Australia—evidence from lower crustal ecologitic and granulitic
xenoliths. J. Metamorph. Geol. 1, 25–45.
Wild, A.J., Hudson, J.A., 1998. A geometrical approach to the
elastic complex screen. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 707– 725.
Wild, A.J., Hobbs, R.W., Frenje, L., 2000. Modelling complex
media: an introduction to the phase-screen method. Phys. Earth
Planet. Inter. 120, 219–225.
Yilmaz, O¨ ., 1987. Seismic data processing. Soc. Explor. Geophys.,
Investig. Geophys. 2 (526 pp).
224 B.J. Drummond et al. / Tectonophysics 388 (2004) 213–224