Publication details for Dr Martin SmithBrazeau, M. D., Guillerme, T. & Smith, M. R. (2019). An algorithm for morphological phylogenetic analysis with inapplicable data. Systematic Biology 68(4): 619-631.
- Publication type: Journal Article
- ISSN/ISBN: 1063-5157, 1076-836X
- DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy083
- Further publication details on publisher web site
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
- View in another repository - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
Other versions of this publication
- 2017: Morphological phylogenetic analysis with inapplicable data (older version)
Morphological data play a key role in the inference of biological relationships and evolutionary history, and are essential for the interpretation of the fossil record. The hierarchical interdependence of many morphological characters, however, complicates phylogenetic analysis. In particular, many characters only apply to a subset of terminal taxa. The widely used “reductive coding” approach treats taxa in which a character is inapplicable as though data on the character’s state is simply missing (unknown). This approach has long been known to create spurious tree length estimates on certain topologies, potentially leading to erroneous results in phylogenetic searches–but no practical solution has previously been suggested. Here we present a single-character algorithm for reconstructing ancestral states in reductively coded datasets, following the theoretical guideline of minimizing homoplasy over all characters. Our algorithm uses up to three traversals to score a tree, and a fourth to fully resolve final states at each node within the tree. We use explicit criteria to resolve ambiguity in applicable/inapplicable dichotomies, and to optimize missing data. So that it can be applied to single characters, the algorithm employs local optimization; as such, the method provides a fast but approximate inference of ancestral states and tree score. The application of our method to published morphological datasets indicates that, compared to traditional methods, it identifies different trees as “optimal”. As such, the use of our algorithm to handle inapplicable data will significantly alter the outcome of tree searches, modifying the inferred placement of living and fossil taxa and potentially leading to major differences in reconstructions of evolutionary history.