|








|

The
'Bloody Code' was the name given to the English legal system from the
late 17th century to the early 19th century. Why do you think
it was called that? Take a look at the information in the
tables and see if you can think of an answer.
| No
of crimes carrying the death penalty |
| 1688 |
50 |
| 1765 |
160 |
| 1815 |
225 |
It
was known as the 'Bloody Code' because of the huge numbers of crimes
for which the death penalty could be imposed. If you look at the statute
books for the 18th century it would seem as if every crime was punishable
by death, even those which we would consider to be very minor or trivial
today.

There
were many reasons why the English legal system was so harsh at this
time. First, the attitudes of the wealthy men who made the law were
unsympathetic. They felt that people who committed crimes were sinful,
lazy or greedy and deserved little mercy. Secondly, since the rich made
the laws they made laws that protected their interests. Any act which
threated their wealth, property or sense of law and order was criminalised
and made punishable by death. You could be executed for stealing anything
worth more than five shillings (equivalent to approximately £30
today)! Thirdly, the law was harsh to act as a deterrent. It was thought
that people might not commit crimes if they knew that they could be
sentenced to death. This was also the reason why executions were public
spectacles until the 1860s. The authorities believed that hanging criminals
in public would frighten people into obeying the law and refrain from
commiting crime. From 1816 in Durham, hangings were carried out at the
front of the Crown Court with crowds of people coming from far and wide
to watch. Some well-off members of the public even hired the balconies
of local houses and the Dun Cow pub to get a better view!

Engraving
by William Heath from 1831 showing the artist's view of justice. Taken
from The Hanging Tree by Vic Gattrell. (DUL ref: 343.23
GAT)

Despite
the prevalence of the 'Bloody Code', not everyone found guilty of crime
was executed! Other punishments also existed. In medieval times, criminals
could be branded (burning a mark onto the skin), or mutilated (chopping
off a limb such as an arm or a leg). The guilty could also be publicly
whipped or humilated in the pillory or stocks.
Even
those sentenced to death might not be executed. Criminals were often
given the chance to avoid death by joining the Army or the Navy or to
be transported to the colonies in America and Canada, and later Australia.
In fact, transportation became a very popular mode of punishment. It
has been estimated that over one-third of all criminals convicted between
1788 and 1867 were transported to Australia and Van Diemen's Land (now
Tasmania).
The
other form of punishment which became increasingly popular with the
authorities was incarceration in prison.

|
| Some
of the crimes carrying the death penalty in the 1700s |
- stealing horses or sheep
- destroying turnpike roads
- cutting down trees
- pickpocketing goods worth more than one shilling
- being out at night with a blackened face
- unmarried mother concealing a stillborn child
- arson
- forgery
- stealing from a rabbit warren
- murder
|

A
Rowlandson engraving of an execution at Newgate, clearly showing the
carnival aspect of the event. Taken from The Lesson of the Scaffold
by David R Cooper. (DUL ref: 343.23 COO)

It
is fair to say that the 'Bloody Code' did not work very well. Trials
for serious offences sometimes lasted only a few minutes, there was
often no chance for the defence to present their case and, to the modern
eye, it seems like it was a lottery whether the accused would be found
innocent or guilty. As always, it was easier if you were rich. You could
afford proper legal representation and persuade the wealthy and famous
to act as character witnesses for you.
However,
the main problem with the 'Bloody Code' was that juries were often unwilling
to find the accused guilty knowing that the punishment was execution.
Indeed, so desperate were some judges to secure results that they deliberately
under-valued stolen goods so that the accused would no longer face the
death penalty. Evidence suggests that despite the 'Bloody Code' fewer
people were hanged in the 18th century than previously. It has been
estimated that around 200 hangings took place each year in England and
Wales at this time.

A
late 18th century engraving of convicts arriving in Botany Bay by
George Barrington. (DUL ref: 994.02 B2 BAR)
|