Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Research

Policing domestic abuse

(3 March 2017)

‘Out of court resolutions’, including apologies, are used in domestic abuse cases by all police forces in England, Wales and Northern Ireland despite official guidance advising against their use, according to new research.

The researchers from Durham University are calling for an immediate stop to these street level resolutions in cases of domestic abuse involving partners or ex-partners.

Apologies and reparation

Using the Freedom of Information Act, the team from Durham’s Centre for Research into Violence and Abuse discovered that in 2014 ‘out of court resolutions’ – community resolutions and restorative justice - were used in 5,466 cases across 45 police forces.

The most common out of court resolution (in 43 per cent of cases) was a verbal or written apology to the victim, or an apology to the police officer. The second most common action, in 27 per cent of cases, was reparation, such as the damage paid for or replaced.

Unacceptable risks

Current College of Policing guidance states that out of court resolutions are ‘rarely appropriate’ in domestic abuse cases. The Independent Police Complaints Commission has also stated that ‘restorative justice should not be used in cases of domestic abuse’ and Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) has warned of ‘unacceptable risks’.

Lead author, Professor Nicole Westmarland from Durham University, said: “This study is the latest in a long line to show that there are still fundamental problems about how domestic violence and abuse is policed.

“Gaps between policy and practice and resources and demands are ever increasing and action needs to be taken to hold perpetrators to account.”

Serious crimes

The study, published in the British Journal of Criminology, found that many forces are potentially putting lives at risk with very serious crimes being dealt with by means of out of court resolutions. Every police force, except Police Scotland, had used out of court resolutions in domestic abuse cases.

They were used for a broad range of serious criminal offences which, if prosecuted, have potential sentencing tariffs of up to life imprisonment. These offences included actual bodily harm, harassment, threat to kill, and arson endangering life.

Most often, out of court resolutions were used for violence against the person – in 56 per cent of the 1,098 cases where this information was available. This included 131 cases of common assault and battery, 101 cases of actual bodily harm, and 100 cases of harassment.

Calling for change

Co-author, Professor Clare McGlynn from Durham University’s Law School, commented: “First and foremost, the police must stop using these street level resolutions in cases of domestic abuse and College of Policing and National Police Chief guidance needs to be strengthened.

“We also need an open and informed public debate about the role of restorative justice and other alternatives to the criminal justice system for cases of domestic abuse.”

Some actions had distinct overlaps with criticisms of pre-1990s policing of domestic abuse, for example: ‘words of advice given’, ‘note signed to effect that offender will behave, or ‘[advised to] seek marriage guidance’.

Putting lives at risk

West Midlands came out with the highest proportion of cases using out of court resolutions for domestic abuse crimes (4.4 per cent). North Wales came out with the lowest proportion of cases (0.3 per cent). 

Polly Neate, Chief Executive of Women’s Aid, said: “Clearly, restorative justice is being wrongly used. It is rarely appropriate in domestic abuse cases, because it can minimise the perpetrator’s crime and put survivors of domestic abuse at risk.

“Restorative justice must never be used as an alternative to a more serious criminal justice sanction. Being made to apologise to the victim will not help perpetrators change their behaviour. In fact, it tells them they can abuse with impunity, and offers them a further opportunity for coercive control.

“We urge all police forces and restorative justice practitioners to undertake specialist domestic abuse training. No one should be permitted to offer restorative justice in domestic abuse cases without it.”

 

 

‘Out of court resolutions’

An ‘out of court resolution’ is the umbrella term used to refer to community resolutions and a range of police-led restorative justice practices. They differ from other out of court penalties such as cautions and fixed penalties as they seek a ‘resolution’ to an individual or community level dispute or conflict.

 

What is a community resolution?

Community resolutions are generally used for first time offenders where the victim does not wish to pursue any more formal action through the criminal justice system. They were designed to be used for less serious offences where an offender has been identified – so that police officers can respond to lower level crimes proportionally and be ‘resolved’ by police officers, rather than the criminal justice system.

 

What is restorative justice?

Although many think of restorative justice as planned, face to face meetings between offenders and victims (often referred to as ‘conferences’), there are different ‘levels’ of restorative justice that the police can use:

 

Level 1: an instant or on-street disposal, where police officers or police community support officers use restorative skills to resolve conflict in minor crimes and incidents as an alternative to a formal criminal justice process.

 

Level 2: measures such as restorative justice conferences may involve more participants, risk assessments and seek longer-term solutions. A Level two restorative justice response can occur either as an alternative to criminal justice proceedings, or in addition to criminal justice

proceedings, as part of a formal crime disposal.

 

 

More on this

Research briefing – Policing domestic abuse

Research paper – British Journal of Criminology

Share this story