Publication details for Professor Harriet BulkeleyBulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography 24(8): 875-902.
- Publication type: Journal Article
- ISSN/ISBN: 0962-6298
- DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
- Keywords: Environmental governance, Politics of scale, Networks, Spatial grammar, Global environmental politics, Climate change.
- Further publication details on publisher web site
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
This paper seeks to develop an alternative account of the geographies of environmental governance to those current conceptions which tend to take space and scale for granted as pre-given, contained, natural entities. Through an engagement with the debates on the politics of scale, the argument is made that a new spatial grammar of environmental governance must be sensitive to both the politics of scale and the politics of networks. Rather than considering scalar and non-scalar interpretations of spatiality as necessarily opposite, the paper argues that through a more careful deployment of concepts of hierarchy and territory common ground between scalar and network geographies can be forged, and can inform our understanding of environmental governance. In making this argument, the paper provides an overview of contemporary configurations of global environmental governance, and seeks to illustrate by reference to one transnational municipal network, the Cities for Climate Protection programme, how governing the environment involves both political processes of scaling and rescaling the objects and agents of governance, as well as attempts to create new, networked, arenas of governance. The paper concludes that recognition of new spatial grammars is necessary for understanding emerging hybrid forms of environmental governance and their political and ecological implications.
Adger, N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., &
Rosendo, S., et al. (2003). Governance for
sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ understanding of environmental
decision making. Environment and
Planning A, 35(6), 1095e1110.
Agnew, J. (1999). Mapping political power beyond state boundaries:
territory, identity, and movement in
world politics. Millennium, 28(3), 499e521.
Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning
A, 34, 385e399.
Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: towards a new politics of place.
Geografiska Annaler, 86 B, 33e44.
Amin, A., Massey, D., & Thrift, N. (2003). Decentering the nation: A
radical approach to regional
inequality. London: Catalyst.
Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 133e153.
Auer, M. (2000). Who participates in global environmental governance?
Partial answers from
international relations theory. Policy Sciences, 33, 155e180.
Benington, J., & Harvey, J. (1999). Networking in Europe. In G. Stoker
(Ed.), The new management of
British local governance (pp. 197e221). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Betsill, M. M. (2001). Mitigating climate change in US cities:
opportunities and obstacles. Local
Environment, 6(4), 393e406.
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational Networks and Global
the Cities for Climate Protection program. International Studies
Quarterly, 48, 471e493.
Brenner, N. (1998a). Global cities, glocal states: global city formation
and state territorial restructuring in
contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1),
Brenner, N. (1998b). Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial
organization and the historical
geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and
Space, 16, 459e481.
Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the rescaling
of urban governance in the
European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431e451.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on
scalar structuration. Progress in
Human Geography, 25(4), 591e614.
Brenner, N. (2003). Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of
contemporary Western Europe.
European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), 297e324.
Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2003). State space in
question. In N. Brenner, et al.
(Eds.), State/space: A reader (pp. 1e26). Oxford: Blackwell.
Borzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon e on the different conceptions of
policy networks. Public
Administration, 76(Summer), 252e273.
Boyle, M. (2002). Cleaning up after the Celtic Tiger: scalar ‘fixes’
in the political ecology of Tiger
economies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27(2),
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2003). Cities and climate change: Urban
sustainability and global
environmental governance. London: Routledge.
Bulkeley, H., Davies, A., Evans, B., Gibbs, D., Kern, K., & Theobald, K.
governance and transnational municipal networks in Europe. Journal of
Environmental Policy and
Planning, 5(3), 235e254.
Castree, N. (2003). The geopolitics of nature. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, &
G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to
political geography (pp. 423e439). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castree, N. (2004). Differential geographies: place, indigenous rights and
‘local’ resources. Political
Geography, 23, 133e167.
CCP (2004). Climate change and local government. Available from:
cchange_localgov.htmD. Accessed June 2004.
Cowell, R. (2003). Substitution and scalar politics: negotiating
environmental compensation in Cardiff
Bay. Geoforum, 34(3), 343e358.
Cowell, R., & Murdoch, J. (1999). Land use and the limits to (regional)
governance: some lessons from
planning for housing and minerals in England. International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research,
Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the
politics of scale, or: looking for local
politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1e23.
Dicken, P., Kelly, P., Olds, K., & Yeung, H. (2001). Chains and networks,
territories and scales: towards
a relational framework for analyzing the global economy. Global Networks,
Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point: globalisation, deterritorialisation
and the space of the world.
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 8e19.
Fairbrass, J., & Jordan, A. (2001). Protecting biodiversity in the
European Union: national barriers and
European opportunities? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 499e518.
Ford, L. (2003). Challenging global environmental governance: social
movement agency and global civil
society. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 120e134.
Gibbs, D., & Jonas, A. (2000). Governance and regulation in local
environmental policy: the utility of
a regime approach. Geoforum, 31(3), 299e313.
Gibbs, D., & Jonas, A. (2001). Rescaling and regional governance: the
English Regional Development
Agencies and the environment. Environment and Planning C: Government and
Policy, 19(2), 269e280.
Haas, P. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean: The politics of international
environmental cooperation. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological
modernization and the policy process.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of
international regimes. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Heeg, S., Kagge, B., & Ossenbrugge, J. (2003). Metropolitan co-operation
in Europe: theoretical issues
and perspectives for urban networking. European Planning Studies, 11(2),
Herod, A., & Wright, M. (2002). Placing scale: an introduction. In A.
Herod, & M. Wright (Eds.),
Geographies of power: Placing scale (pp. 1e14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Holm Nielsen, E., & Simonsen, K. (2003). Scaling from ‘below’:
Practices, strategies and urban spaces.
European Planning Studies, 11(8), 911e927.
Holton, R. J. (2005). Network discourses: proliferation, critique and
synthesis. Global Networks, 5(2),
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European
Integration Online Papers 5,
no.11. Available from: Chttp://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011.htmD.
Accessed May 2002.
Howitt, R. (1998). Scale as relation; musical metaphors of geographic
scale. Area, 30(1), 49e58.
Howitt, R. (2003). Scale. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A
companion to political geography
(pp. 138e157). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jakobsen, S. (2000). Transnational environmental groups, media, science
and public sentiment(s) in
domestic policy-making on climate change. In R. Higgot, et al. (Eds.),
Non-state actors and authority in
the global system (pp. 274e289). London: Routledge.
Jeffery, C. (2000). Sub-national mobilization and European integration:
does it make any difference?
Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 1e23.
Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. London: Polity.
Jones, M., &MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism:
territory, insurgent politics, and
the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 29(4), 433e452.
Karkkainen, B. (2004). Post-sovereign environmental governance. Global
Environmental Politics, 4(1),
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy
networks in international politics.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kern, K. (2001). Transnationale Sta¨ dtenetzwerke in Europa. In E.
Schro¨ ter (Ed.), Empirische Policy und
Verwaltungsforschung. Lokale, nationale und internationale perspektiven
(pp. 95e116). Leske und
Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (Eds.). (1999). The transformation of
governance in the European Union.
Leitner, H., Pavlik, C., & Sheppard, E. (2002). Networks, governance and
the politics of scale: inter-urban
networks and the European Union. In A. Herod, & M. Wright (Eds.),
Geographies of power: Placing
scale (pp. 274e303). Oxford: Blackwell.
Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (2002). The City is dead, long live the net:
harnessing European interurban
networks for a neoliberal agenda. Antipode, 34(3), 495e518.
Lipschutz, R. (1996). Global civil society and global environmental
governance: The politics of nature from
place to planet. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Lipschutz, R., & Conca, K. (Eds.). (1993). The state and social power in
global environmental politics. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Litfin, K. (1993). Ecoregimes: playing tug of war with the nation state.
In Ronnie Lipschutz, & Ken Conca
(Eds.), The state and social power in global environmental politics (pp.
94e117). New York: Columbia
Litfin, K. (1994). Ozone discourses: Science and politics in global
environmental cooperation. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Litfin, K. (Ed.). (1998). The greening of sovereignty in world politics.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacLeod, G. (2001). New regionalism reconsidered: globalization and the
remaking of political economic
space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(4),
MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy:
rethinking urban and regional
governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503e527.
MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2003). Regional economies, local paternalism:
Scalar relativisation in
a postnational regime. Working Paper, Department of Geography, University
Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing policy networks. Buckingham: Open
Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human
Geography, 24, 219e242.
Marston, S. (2004). A long way from home: domesticating the social
production of scale. In E. Sheppard,
& R. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and
method (pp. 170e191).
Marston, S., & Smith, N. (2001). States, scales and households: limits to
scale thinking? A response to
Brenner. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 615e619.
McCann, E. (2003). Framing space and time in the city: urban policy and
the politics of spatial and
temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 159e178.
Newell, P. (2000). Climate for change: Non-state actors and the global
politics of the greenhouse.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, R., Goetz, A.-M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams, M. (2000).
Contesting global governance:
Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge:
Owens, S. (2004). Siting, sustainable development and social priorities.
Journal of Risk Research, 7(2),
Painter, J. (1999). The Aterritorial city: Diversity, spatiality,
Painter, J. (2004). Territory-network. Paper presented at the Social
Spatial Theory workshop A New
Spatial Grammar, Department of Geography, Durham University, March 2004.
Copy available from
the author, Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE,
Paterson, M. (1996). Global warming and global politics. London:
Paterson, M. (2001). Understanding global environmental politics:
Domination, accumulation, resistance.
Paterson, M., Humphreys, D., & Pettiford, L. (2003). Conceptualizing
global environmental governance:
from interstate regimes to counter-hegemonic struggles. Global
Environmental Politics, 3(2), 1e10.
Paul, D. (2002). Re-scaling IPE: subnational states and the regulation of
the global political economy.
Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 465e489.
Payne, R. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European
Journal of International Relations,
Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state.
Portney, K. (2003). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic
development, the environment and quality
of life in American cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Purcell, M. (2003). Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate:
toward a more synthetic critical
human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 317e332.
Rhodes, R. (1996). The new governance: governing without government.
Political Studies, XLIV,
Rosenau, J. (1997). Along the domesticeforeign frontier: Exploring
governance in a turbulent world.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. (2000). Change, complexity and governance in globalizing
space. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating
governance (pp. 167e200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sasken, S. (2003). Globalization or denationalization? Review of
International Political Economy, 10(1),
Schultze, C. (2003). Cities and EU Governance: policy-takers or
policy-makers? Regional and Federal
Studies, 13(1), 121e147.
Scott, A. (2001). Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European
Planning Studies, 9(7), 813e826.
Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (1997). Transnational social
movements and global politics:
Solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Smith, R. (2003). World city topologies. Progress in Human Geography,
Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics
of rescaling. Environment and
Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 63e76.
Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Scaled geographies: nature, place and the politics
of scale. In E. Sheppard, &
R. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and
method (pp. 129e153). Oxford:
Swyngedouw, E., & Baeten, G. (2001). Scaling the city: the political
economy of development e Brussels’
conundrum. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 827e849.
Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. (2003). Urban political ecology and the
politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5),
United Nations (UN) (1992). Agenda 21. Nairobi: UNEP.
Vogler, J. (2003). Taking institutions seriously: how regime analysis can
be relevant to multilevel
environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 25e39.
Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics.
Albany, NY: State University of New
Wapner, P. (1998). Reorientating state sovereignty: rights and
responsibilities in the environmental age. In
Karen Litfin (Ed.), The greening of sovereignty in world politics (pp.
275e297). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Ward, S., & Williams, R. (1997). From hierarchy to networks? Sub-central
government and EU urban
environmental policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35, 439e464.
Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: nature,
urbanisation and the regulation of
socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183e1206.
Young, O. (1997). Rights, rules and resources in world affairs. In Oran
Young (Ed.), Global governance:
Drawing insights from the environmental experience (pp. 1e23). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Zimmerman, J. (2001). The ‘‘nature’’ of urbanism on the new
urbanist frontier: sustainable development,
or defense of the suburban dream? Urban Geography, 22(3), 249e267.