Publication details for Dr David KerrKerr, David (2005). 'The Sino-Russia Partnership and US Policy Toward North Korea: From hegemony to concert in Northeast Asia'. International Studies Quarterly 49(3): 411-438.
- Publication type: Journal Article
- ISSN/ISBN: 1468-2478
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00371.x
- Keywords: Regional ordering, Dynamic change, Nuclear policy, USSR, Russia, China.
- Further publication details on publisher web site
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
This paper presents two sets of arguments: one theoretical and one analytical. The theoretical arguments concern the relationship between regional ordering and systemic change. The paper questions the usefulness of the unipolar conception of the contemporary system arguing that the interaction of the Great Powers cannot be understood without reference to regional dynamics. Thus, a unipolar system implies considerable potential for U.S. hegemonic intervention at the regional level but in East Asia, we find an equilibrium constructed out of both material and normative forces, defined as a concert, which presents a considerable restraint on all powers, including the U.S. The paper then proceeds to examine these claims through an analysis of the foreign policies of the U.S., Russia, and China over the North Korean nuclear problem that emerged after 2002. It finds that China and Russia have substantive common interests arising from internal and external re-ordering in which they look to strategic partnerships, regional multilateralism, and systemic multipolarization as inter-locking processes. The paper finds that they have collaborated over the Korean crisis to prevent a U.S. unilateral solution but that this should not be construed as a success for an open counterhegemonic strategy as it was only under the constraining conditions of East Asian concert, including the dynamics within the U.S. alliance systems, that this collaboration was successful. Nevertheless, the paper concludes that regional multipolarity and systemic unipolarity are contradictory: a system that exhibits multipolarization at the regional level cannot be characterized as unipolar at the global level.
AFANASIEV, YE, AND K. BARSKII (2003) Tsvetam Slivy Lyubiye Zamorozki Nipochem: o kitaiskom
izmerenii vneshnei politiki Rossii [Frosts are Nothing to the Flowers of the Plumtrees: On The
Chinese Dimension of Russia’s Foreign Policy]. Mirovaya Zhizn’ (7):17–28.
BAZHANOV, YE (2003) Neizbezhnost’ Mnogopolyusnogo Mira [The Inevitability of a MultipolarWorld].
Mirovaya Zhizn’ (8):44–51.
BBC MONITORING ONLINE (BBCMO) (2001a) ‘‘Newspaper Responds to CIA Director’s Claims of
Russian Threat.’’ Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Moscow, 9 February 2001.
BBCMO (2001b) ‘‘China: Agency Carries ‘‘Full Text’’ of Jiang Zemin’s Speech at Moscow University.’’
Xinhua News Agency Domestic Service, Beijing, 1209 gmt 17 July 2001.
BBCMO (2001c) ‘‘Russia Looks at Northeast Asia Security Forum IdeaFMinister.’’ ITAR-TASS News
Agency, Moscow, 0839 gmt 26 July 2001.
BBCMO (2001d) ‘‘Duma’s Arbatov Downbeat on US–Russian NMD and ABM Consultations.’’ Nezavisimaya
Gazeta, Moscow, 14 August 2001, p. 6.
BBCMO (2001e) ‘‘Russian–US Links will not Harm Relations with ChinaFDiplomatic Source.’’ ITARTASS
News Agency, Moscow, 0858 gmt 14 December 2001.
BBCMO (2002a) ‘‘Text of Joint News Conference by Chinese, US Presidents in Beijing.’’ China Central
TV, Beijing, 0515 gmt 21 February 2002.
BBCMO (2002b) ‘‘China’s Hu Jintao Proposes ‘‘Four Principles’’ in Developing Sino–US Ties.’’
Zhongguo Xinwen She News Agency, Beijing, 2 May 2002.
BBCMO (2002c) ‘‘Russia Eager to ‘‘Recover Lost Positions’’ Over North Korea Says Paper.’’ Kommersant,
Moscow, 27 December 2002.
BBCMO (2003a) ‘‘China Disagrees with North Korea’s Decision to Withdraw from Nuclear Treaty.’’
Zhongguo Xinwen She News Agency, Beijing, 14 January 2003.
BBCMO (2003b) ‘‘Text of Sino–Russia Communique on North Korea.’’ Xinhua News Agency Domestic
Service, Beijing, 0610 gmt 27 February 2003.
BBCMO (2003c) ‘‘Russia Unwilling to Give North Korea Individual Security Guarantees.’’ Interfax
News Agency, Moscow, 1159 gmt 11 April 2003.
BBCMO (2003d) ‘‘China Makes ‘Aggressive’ Efforts to Bring North Korea to Multilateral Talks.’’
Yonhap News Agency, Seoul, 1254 gmt 16 April 2003.
BBCMO (2003e) ‘‘Chinese Spokesman Reassures Moscow over Beijing Talks on Korea.’’ ITAR-TASS
News Agency, Moscow, 0851 gmt 21 April 2003.
BBCMO (2003f) ‘‘China’s Party Daily Comments Tripartite North Korea Talks.’’ Renmin Ribao web
site, Beijing 23 April 2003, p. 3.
BBCMO (2003g) ‘‘Russia, China Block US UN Resolution Condemning North Korea Nuclear Programme.’’
Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Moscow, 4 July 2003.
BBCMO (2003h) ‘‘Russian Official Predicts Multi-Party Talks on North Korea Before 15 September.’’
Yonhap New Agency, Seoul, 1252 gmt 25 July 2003.
BBCMO (2003i) ‘‘US Urges North Korea to Join Multilateral Nuclear Talks.’’ Yonhap New Agency,
Seoul, 0139 gmt 31 July 2003.
BBCMO (2003j) ‘‘Beijing, Moscow See Eye to Eye on North KoreaFChinese Official.’’ Interfax News
Agency, Moscow, 1410 gmt 22 August 2003.
BBCMO (2003k) ‘‘Hong Kong Article Praises Chinese Leader Hu’s Diplomacy in Korean Crisis.’’
Hong Kong Economic Journal, 28 August 2003.
BBCMO (2004) ‘‘Hong Kong Analyst Views North Korea Working Group Talks in China.’’ Ta Kung
Pao web site, Hong Kong, 12 May 2004.
BERGER, THOMAS (2000) Set for Stability? Prospects for Conflict and Cooperation in East Asia. Review of
International Studies 26:405–428.
BETTS, RICHARD K. (1993/1994) Wealth, Power and Instability: East Asia and the United States after
the Cold War. International Security 18(3):34–77.
BLUM, SAMANTHA (2003) Chinese Views of US Hegemony. Journal of Contemporary China 12(35):
BOGATUROV, A. (2003) Irakskii Krizis i Strategiya ‘Navyazannogo Konsensusa’ [The Iraq Crisis and the
Strategy of ‘Imposed Consensus’]. Mirovaya Zhizn’ (3):30–39.
BROOKS, STEPHEN G., AND WILLIAM C. WOHLFORTH (2002) American Primacy in Perspective. Foreign
BULL, HEDLEY (2002) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. New York:
Columbia University Press.
BULYCHEV, G. (2004) Koreiskii Pat [Korean Stalemate]. Novostei Vremya, 12 February 2004.
BUSZYNSKI, LESZEK (2000) Russia and Northeast Asia: Aspirations and Reality. The Pacific Review
BUZAN, BARRY (2003) Security Architecture in Asia: The Interplay of Regional and Global Levels. The
Pacific Review 16(2):143–173.
CHA, VICTOR (2002) Korea’s Place in the Axis. Foreign Affairs 81(3):79–92.
CHEN, JIAN (2003) ‘‘Limits of the ‘Lips and Teeth’ Alliance: An Historical Review of Chinese–North
Korean Relations.’’ in Woodrow Wilson Centre for Scholars, Asia Program Special Report 115.
CUMINGS, BRUCE (2003) Wrong Again. London Review of Books 25(3). Available at hhttp://www.lrb.cc.uk/
FENG, ZHONGPING (2003) Ouzhou Guojia dui Meiguo Guanxi Kaolu jiqi Yingxiang [Considering
the European Countries Relations with America and Its Influence]. Xiandai Guoji Guanxi
FERGUSON, JOSEPH P. (2003) Russia’s Role on the Korean Peninsula and Great Power Relations in
Northeast Asia. NBR Analysis 14(1). Available at: hhttp://www.nbr.org/publications/analysis/vol14-
FRIEDBERG, AARON L. (1993/1994) Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International
GILL, BATES (2002) September 11 and Northeast Asia: Change and Uncertainty in Regional Security.
Brookings Review 20(3):43–46.
GOLDSTEIN, AVERY (2001) The Diplomatic Face of China’s Grand Strategy: A Rising Power’s Emerging
Choice. The China Quarterly 168(December):835–864.
GWEON, YONG-LIB (2004) The Changing Perception of America in South Korea: Transition or Transformation.
The Korea Journal 44(1):152–177.
HAN, SUKHEE (2004) Alliance Fatigue and Asymmetrical Interdependence: Sino–North Korean Relations
in Flux. The Korean Journal of Defence Analysis 16(1):155–179.
JIN, CANRONG (2001) The US Global Strategy in the Post-ColdWar Era and Its Implications for China–
United States Relations: A Chinese Perspective. Journal of Contemporary China 10(27):309–315.
JOHNSTON, ALASTAIR IAIN (2003) Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security 27(4):5–56.
KANG, DAVID C. (2003a) Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International
KANG, DAVID C. (2003b) International Relations Theory and the Second Korean War. International
Studies Quarterly 47:301–324.
KANG, DAVID C. (2003c) ‘‘Hierarchy and Stability in Asian International Relations.’’ In International
Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, edited by G. J. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno. New York:
Columbia University Press.
KANG, DAVID C. (2003d) The Avoidable Crisis in North Korea. Orbis 47(3):1–16.
KASEDA, YOSHINORI (2003) ‘‘Japan and the Korean Peace Process.’’ In The Korean Peace Process and the
Four Powers, edited by T. H. Kwak and S. -H. Joo. Aldershot: Ashgate.
KERR, DAVID (1995) The New Eurasianism: The Rise of Geopolitics in Russian Foreign Policy. Europe–
Asia Studies 47(6):977–988.
KIM, SAMUEL S. (2002) ‘‘North Korea and Northeast Asia in World Politics.’’ In North Korea and
Northeast Asia, edited by S. S. Kim and T. H. Lee. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
KIM, SAMUEL S. (2003) ‘‘China and North Korea in a Changing World.’’ in Woodrow Wilson Centre
for Scholars, Asia Program Special Report 115.
KIM, T. (2001) A Testing Ground for China’s Power, Prosperity and Preferences: China’s Post-Cold
War Relations with the Korean Peninsula. Pacifica Review 13(1):31–40.
KISSINGER, HENRY (1994) Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
KOMLEVA, N. (2003) Geopoliticheskoe Szhatie [Geopolitical Contractions]. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye
KUPCHAN, CHARLES A. (1998) After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the
Sources of Stable Multipolarity. International Security 22(1):40–79.
LABETSKAYA, V. K. (2003) Nashi Otsenki ne Ustraivayut SShA kak Slishkom Myagkie po Otnosheniyu k
Severnoi Koree [Our Evaluations Don’t Suit the US as Too Soft in Relation to North Korea].
Vremya Novostei, 23 July 2003, p. 133.
LAYNE, CHRISTOPHER (1993) The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Emerge. International
LEE, CHUNG MIN (2004) Rethinking Future Paths on the Korean Peninsula. The Pacific Review
LI, HUA (2003) Leng Zhan Hou Chaoxian Bandao de Anquan Jizhi yu Zhongguo de Juese [The Post-
Cold War Security System on the Korean Peninsula and China’s Role]. Guizhou Shifan Daxue
Xuebao (Shehui Kexueban) (4):32–37.
LIEVEN, ANATOL (2002) The Secret Policemen’s Ball: The United States, Russia and the International
Order after 11 September. International Affairs 78(2):245–259.
LIGHT, MARGOT (2003) In Search of an Identity: Russian Foreign Policy and the End of Ideology. The
Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 19(3):42–59.
LIM, JONG-CHUL, AND JAEBONG RO (2002) ‘‘Geopolitical and Economic Role of the Korean Peninsula in
the 21st Century.’’ Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Conference Papers.
Available at hhttp://www.kiep.go.kr/Project/Workshop.nsf i.
LUKIN, A. (2002) Rossiya i Dve Korei–Problemy i Perspektivy [Russia and the Two KoreasFProblems
and Prospects]. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya (6):64–70.
MIDRF (2003) Ministerstvo Inostrannykh Del Rossiiskoi Federatsii, ‘‘Sovmestnaya Deklaratsiya
Rossiikoi Federatsii i Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki,’’ Moskva, Kreml’, 27 Maya 2003 goda.
MOFA (2003) Diplomatic Bluebook 2003, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Available at hhttp://
MOON, CHUNG-IN (2003) Nuclear Standoff, the Nation, and the Alliance: Choices for the Roh
Government. Korea and World Affairs 27(1):18–33.
PAVLOV, N. (2003) Voina v Irake. Nekotorye Vysovy dlya Vneshnei Politiki [War in Iraq. Some Challenges
for Foreign Policy]. Mirovaya Zhizn’ (5):3–13.
PETRENKO, V. F., ET AL. (2003) Russian Citizens’ Perceptions of, and Attitudes Toward, Foreign Countries
and Different Nationalities. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 40(6):5–27.
POLLACK, JONATHAN D. (2003) The United States, North Korea, and the End of Agreed Framework.
Naval War College Review, Summer LVI(3):11–49.
REN, XIAO (2000) ‘‘The International Relations Theoretical Discourse in China: A Preliminary Analysis.’’
The Sigur Center Asia Papers. Available at hhttp://www.gwu.edu/sigur/scholar_papers/
ROSS, ROBERT S. (1999) The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century. International
ROZMAN, GILBERT. (1998) Sino–Russian Relations: Will the Strategic Partnership Endure? Demokratizatsiya
ROZMAN, GILBERT (2003) Japan’s North Korea Initiative and US–Japanese Relations. Orbis 47(3):527–
SCO (2001) Deklaratsiya o sozdanii Shankhanskoi Organizatsii Sotrudnichestva Ofitsial’noye Internet-Predstavitel’stvo
Presidenta Rossii. Available at hhttp://www.kremlin.ru/i.
SHAKLEYINA, T. A., AND A. D. BOGATUROV (2004) The Russian Realist School of International Relations.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37:37–51.
SHEN, JIRU (2003) Weihu Dongbei Ya Anquan de DangwuzhijiFZhiye Chao He Wenti Shang de
Weixian Boyi [The Matter of Immediate Urgency in Defending Northeast Asian Security:
Stopping the Dangerous Games Over the Korean Nuclear Problem]. Shijie Jingji yu
SMIRNOV, P. (2003) Mars Tesnit Veneru. Perestroika Soyuznichekikh Prioritetov SShA [Mars Squeezes
Venus: The Reconstruction of the Alliance Priorities of the USA]. Mirovaya Zhizn’ (6):53–68.
SONG, XINNING (2002) ‘‘Constructive and Cooperative Relationship or Strategic Competition? Changing
Paradigms in Sino–American Relations.’’ Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich
Available at hwww.cap.uni-muenchen.de/transatlantic/download/Song.doci.
TANG, WENFANG (2001) Political and Social Trends in the Post-Deng Urban China: Crisis and Stability.
The China Quarterly 168(December):890–909.
TENET, GEORGE J. (2002) Testimony of Director of Central Intelligence, George J. Tenet, Before the
Senate Armed Services Committee, 19 March 2002. Available at hhttp://www.fas.org/irp/congress/
TIAN, CHUNSHENG (2003) ‘‘ ‘911’ Yihou Meiguo he Eluosi Guanxi yiji Bianhua [Post-9/11 Relations
Between the US and Russia and Its Changes].’’ Mimeo, Institute of World Economics and Politics,
TORKUNOV, A. (2004) Novye Vyzovy i Novye Prioritety [New Challenges and New Priorities]. Mirovaya
UNDP (2003) Human Development Report.
VOSKRESSENSKI, A. (2001) ‘‘Russian–Chinese Partnership in a ‘New’ Global Context.’’ in Woodrow
Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Asia Program Special Report 99.
WANG, YIZHOU (1998) Dangqian Wo Guo Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu de Jige Zhengming Dian [Contending
Aspects of the Study of China’s International Politics at Present]. Tianjin Shehui Kexue (1):
WESTON, STEPHANIE A. (2004) The US–Japan Alliance in the New Post Cold War. Japanese Studies
WISHNICK, ELIZABETH (2001) Russia and China: Brothers Again? Asian Survey 15(5):797–821.
YOO, YONG-WON (2003) Pyongyang Keeps Up Weapons Purchases. Chosun Ilbo, 23 October 2003.
Available at hhttp://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200310/200310230005.htmli.
YOU, JI (2001) China and North Korea: A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience. Journal of
Contemporary China 10(28):387–398.
ZHANG, XIZHEN, AND EUGENE BROWN (2001) Policies toward North Korea: A Time for New Thinking.
Journal of Contemporary China 9(25):535–545.
ZHAO, QUANSHENG (2001) China and Major Power Relations in East Asia. Journal of Contemporary China
ZHAO, SUISHENG (2000) Chinese Nationalism and Its International Orientations. Political Science Quarterly
ZHEBIN, A. (2004) Yadernyi Krizis v Koree i Intersy Bezopasnosti Rossii [The Nuclear Crisis in Korea
and the Security Interests of Russia]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka (2):6–21.