Publication details for Professor Rob FergusonFerguson, R.I., Cudden, J.R., Hoey, T.B. & Rice, S.P. (2006). River system discontinuities due to lateral inputs: generic styles and controls. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31(9): 1149-1166.
- Publication type: Journal Article
- ISSN/ISBN: 0197-9337, 1096-9837
- DOI: 10.1002/esp.1309
- Keywords: Tributary junction, Aggradation, Degradation, Gravel-bed river, Sediment transport, Confluence.
- Further publication details on publisher web site
- Durham Research Online (DRO) - may include full text
Author(s) from Durham
In alluvial river systems, lateral inputs of water and/or sediment at junctions or undercut hillsides can disrupt what would otherwise be smooth downstream trends in mainstream bed elevation, channel gradient, and bed grain size. Generic styles of mainstream response to lateral inputs are investigated using a one-dimensional sediment routing model with multiple grain size fractions. Numerical experiments isolate the effects of three para-meters: ratio of tributary to mainstream water flux (QR), ratio of tributary to mainstream bedload flux (FR), and ratio of tributary to mainstream bedload diameter (DR). The findings are not unduly sensitive to the choice of initial conditions or to approximations made in the model. The primary distinction is between junctions that aggrade, causing local profile convexity with interrupted downstream fining, and junctions that degrade. The immediate effects of aggradation extend further upstream than downstream, whereas degradation is much more subdued and has no upstream impact. Aggradation is typical of coarse inputs (DR > 2), and degradation of fine inputs (DR < 1), but very high ratios of QR to FR also promote degradation. Both aggrading and degrading junctions can lead to a change in mainstream bed grain size well below the junction, with higher ratios of QR to FR producing a coarser distal bed. The effect of a tributary reflects the interplay between additional bed load and additional discharge to transport it.
Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M. 2004a. The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks
structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54: 413–427.
Benda L, Andras K, Miller D, Bigeow P. 2004b. Confluence effects in rivers: interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and
disturbance regimes. Water Resources Research 40(5): W05402.
Best JL. 1988. Sediment transport and bed morphology at river channel confluences. Sedimentology 35: 481– 498.
Brierley GJ, Hickin EJ. 1985. The downstream gradation of particle sizes in the Squamish River, British Columbia. Earth Surface Processes
and Landforms 10: 597–606.
Church M. 1992. Channel morphology and typology. In The Rivers Handbook, vol.1, Calow P, Petts GE (eds). Oxford: Blackwell; 126–143.
Church M. 1995. Geomorphic response to river flow regulation: case studies and time-scales. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
Church M, Kellerhals R. 1978. On the statistics of grain size variation along a gravel river. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 15: 1151–
Cudden JR, Ferguson RI, Hoey TB, Rice SP. 2006. TRIB: an Excel spreadsheet for sediment routing in gravel-bed rivers. Computers and
Cui Y, Parker G, Pizzuto J, Lisle TE. 2003. Sediment pulses in mountain rivers: 2. Comparison between experiments and numerical
predictions. Water Resources Research 39(9): 1240.
Dawson M. 1988. Sediment size variation in a braided reach of the Sunwapta River, Alberta, Canada. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 13: 599–618.
Ferguson RI. 2003a. Emergence of abrupt gravel-sand transitions along rivers through sorting processes. Geology 31: 159–162.
Ferguson RI. 2003b. The missing dimension: effects of lateral variation on 1-D calculations of fluvial bedload transport. Geomorphology 56:
Ferguson RI, Church M, Weatherly H. 2001. Fluvial aggradation in Vedder River: testing a one-dimensional sedimentation model. Water
Resources Research 37: 3331–3347.
Gasparini NM, Tucker GE, Bras RL. 2004. Network-scale dynamics of grain-size sorting: implications for downstream fining, stream-profile
concavity, and drainage basin morphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29: 401–22.
Hoey TB, Ferguson RI. 1994. Numerical simulation of downstream fining by selective transport in gravel bed rivers: model development
and illustration. Water Resources Research 30: 2251–2260.
Knighton AD. 1980. Longitudinal changes in size and sorting of stream-bed material in four English rivers. Geological Society of America
Bulletin 91: 55–62.
Knighton AD. 1987. River channel adjustment – the downstream dimension. In River Channels: Environment and Process, Richards KS
(ed.). Blackwell: Oxford; 95–126.
Knighton AD. 1991. Channel bed adjustment along mine-affected rivers of northeast Tasmania. Geomorphology 4: 205–219.
Lane EW. 1955. The importance of fluvial morphology in river hydraulic engineering. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil
Engineers 81: 1–17.
Parker G. 1979. Hydraulic geometry of active gravel rivers. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 105: 1185–1201.
Pizzuto JE. 1995. Downstream fining in a network of gravel-bedded rivers. Water Resources Research 31: 753 –759.
Reid I, Best JL, Frostick LE. 1989. Floods and flood sediments at river confluences. In Floods: Hydrological, Sedimentological and
Geomorphological Implications, Beven K, Carling P (ed.). Wiley: Chichester; 135–150.
Rhoads BL. 1987. Changes in stream channel characteristics at tributary junctions. Physical Geography 8: 346–361.
Rice S. 1998. Which tributaries disrupt downstream fining along gravel-bed rivers? Geomorphology 22: 39–56.
Rice S. 1999. The nature and controls on downstream fining within sedimentary links. Journal of Sedimentary Research 69: 32–39.
Rice S, Church M. 1998. Grain size along two gravel-bed rivers: statistical variation, spatial pattern and sedimentary links. Earth Surface
Processes and Landforms 23: 345–363.
Rice SP, Church M. 2001. Longitudinal profiles in simple alluvial systems. Water Resources Research 37: 417–426.
Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB. 2001. Macroinvertebrate community changes at coarse sediment recruitment points along two gravel
bed rivers. Water Resources Research 37: 2793–2803.
Richards K. 1980. A note on changes in channel geometry at tributary junctions. Water Resources Research 16: 241–244.
Smith ND, Smith DG. 1984. William River: An outstanding example of channel widening and braiding caused by bed-load addition.
Geology 12: 78–82.
Sternberg H. 1875. Untersuchungen über längen Querprofil geschiebeführender Flüsse. Zeitschrift für Bauwesen 25: 483–506.
Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.
Werritty A. 1992. Downstream fining in a gravel bed river in Southern Poland: Lithological controls and the role of abrasion. In Dynamics
of Gravel Bed Rivers, Billi P, Hey RD, Thorne CR, Tacconi P (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 333–346.
Wilcock PR, Crowe JC. 2003. A surface-based transport model for sand and gravel. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 129: 120–128.
Willgoose G, Bras RL, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 1991. A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory. Water
Resources Research 27: 1671–1684.