We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


View Profile

Publication details for Professor Louise Amoore

Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography 25(3): 336-351.

Author(s) from Durham


This article proposes the concept of the biometric border in order to signal a dual-faced phenomenon in the contemporary war on terror: the turn to scientific technologies and managerial expertise in the politics of border management; and the exercise of biopower such that the bodies of migrants and travellers themselves become sites of multiple encoded boundaries. Drawing on the US VISIT programme of border controls (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology), the article proposes three central themes of the politics of the biometric border. First, the use of risk profiling as a means of governing mobility within the war on terror, segregating ‘legitimate’ mobilities such as leisure and business, from ‘illegitimate’ mobilities such as terrorism and illegal immigration. Second, the representation of biometrics and the body, such that identity is assumed to be anchored as a source of prediction and prevention. Finally, the techniques of authorization that allow the surveillance of mobility to be practiced by private security firms and homeland security citizens alike. Throughout the article, I argue that, though the biometric border is becoming an almost ubiquitous frontier in the war on terror, it also contains ambivalent, antagonistic and undecidable moments that make it contestable.


Accenture digital forum. (2004). US DHS to develop and implement US VISIT program at air, land and sea ports of entry. . Accenture hits the daily double. (2004). Business Week, 3891, 74. Accenture press release. (2004). Government security contract to help make US safer. . Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Amoore, L. (2004). Risk, reward and discipline at work. Economy and Society, 33(2), 174e196. Amoore, L. (2006). There is no great refusal: The ambivalent politics of resistance. In M. de Goede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave. Amoore, L., & de Goede, M. (2005). Governance, risk and dataveillance in the war on terror. Crime, Law and Social Change, 43(2), 149e173. Appadurai, A. (1996). Number in the colonial imagination. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Baker, T. (2002). Liability and insurance after September 11: Embracing risk meets the precautionary principle. University of Connecticut School of Law Working Paper Series. Baker, T., & Simon, J. (Eds.). (2002). Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Beta (2004, August). CIO Insight, 42, 22. Bhabha, H. (1994). Frontlines/borderposts. In A. Bammer (Ed.), Displacements: Cultural identities in question. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Bigo, D. (2001). The Mo¨bius ribbon of internal and external security(ies). In M. Albert, D. Jacobson, & Y. Lapid (Eds.), Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bigo, D. (2002). To reassure and to protect: After September 11. Social Science Research Council essay archive. . Biometrics: Great hope for world security or triumph of big brother? (2004, June 18). The Guardian, 17. Billions misspent in post September 11 anti terror buying. (2005, May 8). New York Times, A4. Bleiker, R. (2000). Popular dissent, human agency and global politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Brazilian did not wear bulky jacket. (2005, July 28). The Guardian. . Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso. Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Zizek, S. (2000). Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso. Clarke, R. (1994). Dataveillance: Delivering 1984. In L. Green, & R. Guinery (Eds.), Framing technology: Society, choice and change. London: Routledge. Connolly, W. (2005). Pluralism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Council for Excellence. (2004). We the people: Homeland security from the citizens’ perspective. Council for Excellence in Government in association with Accenture. Coutin, S. B. (2000). Legalizing moves: Salvadoran immigrants’ struggle for US residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Coutin, S. B., Maurer, B., & Yngvesson, B. (2002). In the mirror: The legitimation work of globalization. Law and Social Inquiry, 27(4), 801e843. Cunningham, H., & Heyman, J. M. (2004). Mobilities and enclosures at borders. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 11(3), 289e300. Dear, M., & Lucero, H. M. (2005). Postborder cities, postborder world: The rise of Bajalta California. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 317e321. De Genova, N. P. (2002). Migrant illegality and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419e447. De Goede, M. (2003). Hawala discourses and the war on terrorist finance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(5), 513e532. De Goede, M. (2004). Repoliticising financial risk. Economy and Society, 33(2), 197e217. De Goede, M. (2005). Carnival of money: Politics of dissent in an era of globalizing finance. In L. Amoore (Ed.), The global resistance reader (pp. 379e391). London: Routledge. Department of Homeland Security. (2004). Transcript of Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge at the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins University. . Department of Homeland Security. (2005). Remarks by Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge at the European Policy Centre. . Dillon, M. (2002). Network society, network-centric warfare and the state of emergency. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 71e80. Dillon, M. (2004). The security of governance. In W. Larner, & W. Walters (Eds.), Global governmentality: Governing international spaces. London: Routledge. Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2001). Global governance, liberal peace and complex emergency. Alternatives, 25(1), 117e143. Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edley, C. (2003). The new American dilemma: Racial profiling post-9/11. In R. Leone, & G. Anrig (Eds.), The war on our freedoms: Civil liberties in an age of terrorism. New York: Public Affairs. Ewald, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordan, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Foucault, M. (1976). The will to knowledge. In: The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. London: Penguin. Foucault, M. (1983). Afterword: The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Graham, S. (Ed.). (2004). Cities, war and terrorism: Towards an urban geopolitics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Gregory, D. (2004). The colonial present. Oxford: Blackwell. Heimer, C. (2002). Insuring more, ensuring less: Private regulation through insurance. In T. Baker, & J. Simon (Eds.), Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Home Office (2005). Terrorism: What you can do. London: HMSO. How to cross borders, social or otherwise: Art Project could be a security nightmare. (2004, October 27). New York Times, A48. Homeland security focus. (2004). Military and Aerospace Electronics, 15(7), 4. Hyndman, J. (1997). Border crossings. Antipode, 29(2), 149e176. Johnson, R. (2002). Defending ways of life: The (anti-) terrorist rhetorics of Bush and Blair. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 211e231. Kestelyn, J. (2002). For want of a nail. Intelligent Enterprise, 5(7), 8. Larner, W., & Walters, W. (Eds.). (2004). Global governmentality: Governing international spaces. London: Routledge. Levi, M., & Wall, D. S. (2004). Technologies, security, and privacy in the post-9/11 European Information Society. Journal of Law and Society, 31(2), 194e220. Lyon, D. (2003a). Surveillance after September 11. London: Polity. Lyon, D. (Ed.). (2003b). Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. New York: Routledge. 350 L. Amoore / Political Geography 25 (2006) 336e351 Lyon, D., (2004). Identity cards: Social sorting by database. (OII Issue Brief no.3). Nagel, C. (2002). Geopolitics by any other name: Immigration and the politics of assimilation. Political Geography, 21(8), 971e987. Newman, D. (2001). Boundaries, borders and barriers: Changing geographic perspectives on territorial lines. In M. Albert, D. Jacobson, & Y. Lapid (Eds.), Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Odysseos, L. (2001). Laughing matters: Peace, democracy and the challenge of the comic narrative. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30(3), 709e732. O’Malley, P. (2000). Uncertain subjects: Risks, liberalism and contract. Economy and Society, 29(4), 460e484. Plan to improve relations with Muslim communities. (2005, August 1). The Guardian, 8. van der Ploeg, I. (2003). Biometrics and the body as information: Normative issues of the socio-technical coding of the body. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as Social Sorting. London: Routledge. Rose, N., & Valverde, M. (1998). Governed by law? Social and Legal Studies, 7(4), 541e551. Rules of crime. (2004). New Museum of Contemporary Art. . Salter, M. (2003). Rights of passage: The passport in international relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Schneider, F. (2002). BorderXing guide: Reverse authentification. London: Tate Modern. The price of protecting the airways. (2001). Business Week. . Thrift, N. (2004). Movementespace: The changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness. Economy and Society, 33(4), 582. US House of Representatives. (2002). Helping federal agencies meet their homeland security missions: How private sector solutions can be applied to public sector problems. Testimony transcript, February 26. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement. Valverde, M., & Mopas, M. (2004). Insecurity and the dream of targeted governance. InW. Larner, &W. Walters (Eds.), Global governmentality: Governing international spaces. London: Routledge. Van Munster, R. (2004). The war on terrorism: When the exception becomes the rule. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 17, 141e153. Walters, W. (2002). Mapping Schengenland: Denaturalizing the border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 561e580.