Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham University

Research & business

View Profile

Publication details for Dr Wayne Dawson

Hulme, P.E., Pauchard, A.B., Pysek, P., Vila, M., Alba, C., Blackburn, T.M., Bullock, J.M., Chytry, M., Dawson, W., Dunn, A.M., Essl, F., Genovesi, P., Maskell, L.C., Meyerson, L.A., Nunez, M.A., Pergl, J., Pescott, O.L., Pocock, M.J.O., Richardson, D.M., Roy, H.E., Smart, S.M., Štajerová, K., Stohlgren, T.J., van Kleunen, M. & Winter, M. (2015). Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(23): E2988 - E2989.

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

Conservation scientists and practitioners have long recognized that not all non-native species pose a threat to biodiversity, yet some ecologists still fail to grasp this message (1). The conclusions drawn by Thomas and Palmer (2) that non-native plant species are not a threat to floral diversity in Britain highlight how this lack of understanding can lead to inappropriate analyses and misleading inferences regarding the impacts of non-native species. Thomas and Palmer base their conclusions on an analysis of the Countryside Survey (CS): this valuable dataset depicts large-scale vegetation changes in common habitats, but its stratified random design does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of non-native plant species on native …