Crowd Sourcing and Worship (The Church and the Avant-garde #2)
(4 October 2011)
I've been following Imogen Heap's progress on her new album - the first song - working title #heapsong1, now Lifeline - began with a call to fans to send in ideas for lyrics and sound samples...
I've been following Imogen Heap's progress on her new album - the first song - working title #heapsong1, now Lifeline - began with a call to fans to send in ideas for lyrics and sound samples. The final song is part Imogen Heap, part Imogen Heap fans. Heap was also involved in the Love the Earth Film which was edited from thousands of nature clips sent in by the public. This collaborative concept is called crowd-sourcing, and developed as a creative business solution, involving potentially anyone, primarily online. Sometimes, contributors are rewarded, but crowd-sourcing has come in for criticism if it is seen to exploit folks who offer free service. In practice, because it is an opt-in process, this is not a problem, and I'm pretty sure that if Imogen Heap used my lyric idea, I'd be happy enough to leave it at that.
Such collaborative creativity is not new - a Cathedral is nothing if not a collaborative work of art. Furthermore, during worship, there is a sense in which the minister's role is to focus and join together the work of the wholepeople - an opt-in moment of creative communal expression. Whether or not it feels like this is, of course, a different matter, and on that note, the possibilities of online crowd sourcing present themselves as an exciting framework for worship. It suggests to me ways in which diverse and marginal voices can gather into some kind of shared expression, deepening the scope of artistic expression in ways that are perhaps simply not otherwise practical.
Does the minister then become an 'editor'? Perhaps, and perhaps again such crowd-sourcing opens up ways of reducing the amount of final control. These are tricky issues, but they are worth facing if the potential gain is a renewal of communal worship that draws on as wide and diverse a range of expression as the people are diverse. It suggests a way in which the Christian worship might embrace the gift of the avant-garde.
#BIGRead14: Joy (Read by @partakers_dave)
I have a sinking feeling that when I look back over my life, from the distance of great years, or the moment when I know the crash will be fatal, […]
(23 Apr 2014) » #BIGRead14: Joy (Read by @partakers_dave)
Some thoughts on personal, trusted recommendations (@headphonaught)
As part of my Lenten journey, I have been meditating on consumption and have taken, or at least tried to take, time out from buying music, films and books. I’ll […]
#Luke2Acts : A Shared Bible Study on Twitter
Starting this Wednesday, April 23, a new shared Bible study is starting on Twitter. We will be reading a chapter every day, from the beginning of the gospel of Luke until the end of the book […]
(22 Apr 2014) » #Luke2Acts : A Shared Bible Study on Twitter
#BIGRead14: Reconciliation (Read by Bethany Bennett)
We are standing apart. too far apart to touch – thank goodness. We face each other but don’t see the face. We look over. We look through. We look at. […]
(22 Apr 2014) » #BIGRead14: Reconciliation (Read by Bethany Bennett)
#BIGRead14: O Thou (Read by Marian Partington)
O beginning! O beauty! O brilliance! O wonder! O presence! O silence! O mercy! O wholeness! O healing! O energy! O darkness! O glory! O friend! O end! O thou! […]
(21 Apr 2014) » #BIGRead14: O Thou (Read by Marian Partington)