Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Department of Philosophy

Recent Seminars and Lectures

Donnchadh O'Conaill (Durham) - The Commonsense Argument For Pluralism

2nd December 2010, 11:30, Room 005, 48/49 Old Elvet

 

Weekly Research Seminar:

Please note that this seminar was held in room 005, 48/49 Old Elvet, Durham. Refreshments were served from 11am with the talk commencing at 11.30am.

Title: The Commonsense Argument For PluralismAbstract:
The priority monist holds that the cosmos is the only fundamental object, of which every other concrete object is a dependent part. One major argument against monism goes back to Russell, who claimed that pluralism is favoured by commonsense. However, Jonathan Schaffer turns this argument on its head and uses it to defend priority monism. He suggests that commonsense holds that the cosmos is a whole, of which ordinary physical objects are arbitrary portions, and that arbitrary portions depend for their existence on the existence of the whole.
In this paper, we challenge Scahffer's claim that the parts of the cosmos are all arbitrary portions. We suggest that there is a way of carving up the universe such that at least some of its parts are not arbitrary. We offer two arguments in support of this claim. First, we shall outline semantic reasons in its favour: in order to accept that empirical judgements are made true or false by the way the world is, one must accept that the cosmos includes parts whose existence is not arbitrary. Second, we offer an ontological argument: in order for macro-physical phenomena to exist, there must be some micro-physical order which they depend upon, and this order must itself be non-arbitrary.
We conclude that Schaffer's commonsense argument for monism cannot be made to work.

Download this event in iCalendar format