News

Education research ignites Dyslexia debate

(2 September 2005)

A Professor at Durham University’s School of Education has sparked a major debate about the status of dyslexia and the value of labelling of some people with reading problems as “dyslexic”.

Professor Julian Elliott, who raised the issue at a conference in Durham earlier this year, takes part in a Channel 4 television programme on 8 September and writes about it in the Times Educational Supplement of 2 September.

He says there is no consensus about to define dyslexia and what diagnostic criteria to use. He says a “dyslexia industry” has grown up based in a spurious link between diagnosis and intervention. This leads to expectations that being diagnosed “dyslexic” is a signpost to recovery, and that dyslexia implies that someone is intellectually bright, in spite of their reading problems – which Professor Elliott says is not necessarily the case.

Instead, he says, there needs to be more attention on assessing and addressing individual reading problems.

Professor Elliott is a former teacher of children with learning difficulties, educational psychologist and President of the International Association for Cognitive Education.

See coverage:
http://www.thes.co.uk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4205932.stm
and a Professor Elliott profile:
www.dur.ac.uk/education/research/profilesAF1.htm#SectionE