Publication details for Professor Phil MacnaghtenMacnaghten, P. Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and 'nature'. Sociology. 2004;38:533--551.
- Publication type: Journal papers: academic
- ISSN/ISBN: 0038-0385, 1469-8684
- DOI: 10.1177/0038038504043217
- Keywords: Animals, Embodiment, Ethics, Genetic modification, Nature, Risk.
- View online: Online version
- Durham research online: DRO record
Author(s) from Durham
This article seeks to engage with contemporary debates on the social and ethical dimensions of genetically modified (GM) animals. Dominant policy ethical approaches and frameworks are criticized for failing radically to accommodate some of the most important dimensions of concern. Drawing on primary empirical data emphasizing existing embodied relationships to animals, the article analyses how people express ethical concern over GM animals, including their sense of the continuities and discontinuities between GM animals and those determined by conventional selective breeding practices. The findings suggest that GM animals are likely to become an issue of public controversy, especially in the animal testing domain, due to the ways in which they symbolize and give voice to underlying tensions between ‘moral’and ‘instrumental’approaches to animals.The article concludes that people reject GM animals as ‘going against nature’, and that such concerns reflect wider unease about science, about technological modernity, and about hubris.
Adam, B. (1998) Timescapes of Modernity. London: Routledge.
AEBC (2001) Crops on Trial. London: AEBC.
AEBC (2002) Animals and Biotechnology. London: AEBC.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage.
Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash (1995) Reflexive Modernisation. Cambridge:
Benton, T. (1992) ‘Animals and Us: Relations or Ciphers’, History of the Human
Sciences 5(2): 123–30.
Benton, T. (1993) Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice.
Blair, A. (2002) Science Matters. Speech to the Royal Society, May 23, London.
Breakwell, G. (2001) Research in the UK on Public Attitudes to Biotechnology with
Animals. London: AEBC.
Cooper, D. (1998) ‘Intervention, Humility and Animal Integrity’, in A. Holland and
A. Johnston (eds) Animal Biotechnology and Ethics. London: Chapman and
ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme (1999) The Politics of GM Food:
Risk, Science and Public Trust. Special Briefing No. 5, University of Sussex, UK.
European Federation of Biotechnology (1999) Ethical Aspects of Agricultural
Biotechnology. The Hague: European Federation of Biotechnology.
Fiddes, N. (1991) Meat: A Natural Symbol. London: Routledge.
Franklin, A. (1999) Animals and Modern Culture. London: Sage.
Franklin, A. (2001) ‘Neo-Darwinian Leisures, the Body and Nature: Hunting and
Angling in Modernity’, Body and Society 7(4): 57–76.
Franklin, A. (2002) Nature and Social Theory. London: Sage.
Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology
Revolution. London: Profile.
Genewatch (2002) Genetically Modified and Cloned Animals. All in a Good Cause?
Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.
Griffiths, S. and J. Wallace (eds) (1998) Consuming Passions: Food in the Age of
Anxiety. Manchester: Mandolin.
Grove-White, R. (2001) ‘GMs, Ethics and Public Policy: Some Reflections’,
Biotechnology and Global Governance: Crisis and Opportunity conference.
Weatherhead Centre, Harvard University, April 26–28.
Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten, S. Mayer and B. Wynne (1997) Uncertain World:
Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain.
Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten and B. Wynne (2000) Wising up: The Public and
New Technology. Lancaster: CSEC.
Heelas, P., S. Lash and P. Morris (1996) Detraditionalisation. Oxford: Blackwell.
INRA (1993) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europeans Think
about Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 39.1. Brussels: European Commission.
INRA (2000) The Europeans and Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 52.1. Brussels:
Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley and A. Amos (1998) ‘Drawing the Line: An
Analysis of Lay People’s Discussions about the New Genetics’, Public
Understanding of Science 7: 113–33.
Macnaghten, P. (2001) Animal Futures: Public Attitudes and Sensibilities towards
Animals and Biotechnology in Contemporary Britain, Lancaster: IEPPP.
Macnaghten, P. and G. Myers (2004) ‘Focus Groups: The Moderator’s View and the
Analyst’s View’, in G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, C. Searle and D. Silverman (eds)
Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage.
Macnaghten, P. and J. Urry (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.
May, R. (1999) Genetically Modified Foods: Facts, Worries, Policies and Public
Confidence. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Office of Science and
MORI (1999) Animals in Medicine and Science: General Public Research
Conducted for Medical Research Council. London: MRC.
Mulgan, G. (2002) ‘After Humanity’, Prospect 75: 22–7.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically Modified Foods: The Ethical and
Social Issues. London: Nuffield Council for Bioethics.
POST [Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology] (2001) Animal Procedures:
Postnote May 2001 number E4. London: POST.
Royal Commission on Environment and Pollution (1998) Setting Environmental
Standards: 21st Report. London: HMSO.
Royal Society (1992) Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. London: Royal
Royal Society (2001) The Use of Genetically Modified Animals: Policy Document
5/01. London: Royal Society.
Royal Society (2002) ‘Medical Progress at Stake in GM Animals Debate, Warns
Royal Society’, Royal Society Press Release, 10 June, London.
Schlosser, E. (2001) Fast Food Nation. London: Allen Lane.
Tester, K. (1991) Animals and Society: The Humanity of Animal Rights. London:
Thomas, K. (1985) Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England
1500–1800. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
UK BBSRC (1996) Ethics, Morality and Crop Biotechnology. London: UK
Department of Trade and Industry.
UK Home Office (2001) ‘Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals in
Great Britain 2000. Command Paper 5244. London: HMSO.
UK House of Lords (2000) Science and Society, Report of the Select Committee on
Science and Society, March 2000 (Lord Jenkin, Chair).
Ungar, S. (2001) ‘Moral Panic Versus the Risk Society: The Implications of the
Changing Sites of Social Anxiety’, British Journal of Sociology 52(2): 271–91.
Wynne, B (2001) ‘Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on
GMOs’, Science as Culture 10(4): 445–81.