Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

School of Education

Publication details for Mr Adrian Simpson

Duffin, J. & Simpson, A. (2005). Cognitive Empathy and the Transition to Independent Graduate Study in Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 58(1): 121-135.

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

Thirteen PhD students took part in interviews focussed on the nature of their own learning of mathematics. In analysing these interviews an unexpected category emerged concerning the students' awareness of others as having particular types of learning goal. In this paper we explore the three levels which we discerned within this category and link them to the notion of cognitive empathy. We suggest that differences in one's own cognitive style are linked to differences in the ability to empathise with those whoo have alternative learning goals. We also consider how these two features - cognitive style and cognitive empathy - may cme to be linked.

References

Baron-Cohen, S.: 1995, Mindblindness, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Brousseau, G.: 1997, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht.
Burgess, R.: 1988, ‘Conversations with a purpose: The ethnographic interview in educational
research’, in R. Burgess (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology, JAI Press,
London, pp. 137–155.
Burton, L.: 1999, ‘The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to
know mathematics?’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 37, 121–143.
Carlson, M.P.: 1999, ‘The mathematical behavior of six successful graduate mathematics
students: Influences leading to mathematical success’, Educational Studies in Mathematics
40(3), 237–258.
Commons, M. andWolfsont, C.: 2002, ‘A complete theory of empathy must consider stage
changes’, Behavioral and Brain Studies 25(1), 30–31.
Davis, M.H.: 1994, Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach, Brown and Benchmark,
Madison.
Duffin, J.M. and Simpson, A.P.: 1995, ‘Atheory, a story, its analysis and some implications’,
Journal of Mathematical Behavior 14(2), 237–250.
Duffin, J. and Simpson, A.: 2000, ‘When does a way of working become a methodology?’,
Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19(2), 175–188.
Duffin, J. and Simpson, A.: in press, The Transition to Independent Graduate Study in
Mathematics, Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education.
Eisenberg, N.: 1986, Altruistic Emotion, Cognition and Behaviour, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Gallup, G.: 1982, ‘Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates’, Journal of
Primatology 2, 237–248.
Gallup, G. and Platek, S.: 2002, ‘Cognitive empathy presupposes self-awareness: Evidence
from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology and mental illness’, Behavioral and Brain
Studies 25(1), 36–37.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, Chicago.
Herzig, A.H.: 2002, ‘Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students
in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence towards PhD’,
Educational Studies in Mathematics 50(2), 177–212.
Hoffman, M.: 2000, Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice,
Cambridge University Press.
Perry, W.:1970, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A
Scheme, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Pole, C., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R. and Lakin, E.: 1997, ‘Supervision of doctoral students
in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences’, Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education 22, 49–63.
Skemp, R.R.: 1976, ‘Relational understanding and instrumental understanding’, Mathematics
Teaching 77, 20–26.
Skemp, R.R.: 1979, Intelligence, Learning, and Action: A Foundation for Theory and Practice
in Education, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Smith, J.P. and Hungwe, K.: 1998, ‘Conjecture and verification in research and teaching:
Conversations with young mathematicians’, For the Learning of Mathematics 18, 40–46.
Tomasello, M.: 1999, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. and Rakoczy, H.: 2003, ‘What makes human cognition unique? From individual
to shared to collective intentionality’, Mind and Language 18(2), 121–147.