Staff

Publication details for Ms Ros Roberts

Roberts, R. & Gott, R. (2003). Assessment of biology investigations. Journal of biological education 37(3): 114-121.

• Publication type: Journal papers: academic
• ISSN/ISBN: 0021-9266
• Keywords: Assessment, Biology investigations, Concepts of evidence, Fieldwork, Procedural understanding.
• View online: Online version
• Durham research online: DRO record

Author(s) from Durham

• Prof Richard Gott
• Ms Ros Roberts

Abstract

This review makes a case for the assessment of investigations against the Concepts of Evidence in written tests as a potentially more reliable and valid way of assessing the ideas used in all types of biology investigations, thus reducing the distorting effect of assessment on the curriculum.

References

Baxter G P, Shavelson R J, Donnelly J, Johnson S and Welford G (1988) Evaluation of procedure-based scoring for hands-on assessment. Journal of Educatonal Measurement, 29, 1 – 17.
Bencze J L (1996) Correlational studies in school science: breaking the science-experiment-certainty connection. School Science Review, 78, 95 – 101.
DfEE/QCA (1999) The Science National Curriculum. London, UK: DfEE/QCA.
Donnelly J (1995) Curriculum development in science:the lessons of Sc1. School Science Review, 76, 95 – 103.
Donnelly J (2000) Secondary science teaching under the National Curriculum. School Science Review, 81, 27 – 35.
Gott R and Duggan S (2002) Problems with assessment of performance in practical science: which way now? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 183 – 201.
Gott R and Mashiter J (1991) Practical work in science – a task-based approach? in Practical Science. Woolnough, BE (ed). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee(2002) Science education from 14 to 19. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
Keiler L S and Woolnough B E (2002) Practical work in school science: the dominance of assessment. School Science Review, 83, 83 – 88.
Nott M and Wellington J (1999) The state we’re in: issues in Key Stage 3 & 4 science. School Science Review, 81, 13 – 18. QCA (2002) National Curriculum Assessments from 2003. Letter from QCA to all Heads of Science June 2002.
Ruiz-Primo M A and Shavelson R (1995) Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessment: an update. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, San Fancisco, USA.
Roberts R (2001) Procedural understanding in biology: the thinking behind the doing. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 113 – 117.
Roberts R and Gott R (1999) Procedural understanding: its place in the biology curriculum School Science Review, 81, 19–25.
Roberts R and Gott R (2000) Procedural understanding in biology: how is it characterised in texts? School Science Review, 82, 83 – 91.
Solano-Flores G, Jovanovic J, Shavelson R J and Bachman M (1999) On the development and evaluation of a shell for generating science performance assessments. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 293 – 315.
Watson J R, Goldsworthy A and Wood-Robinson V (1999a) What is not fair with investigations. School Science Review, 80, 101 – 106.
Watson J R, Wood-Robinson V and Goldsworthy A (1999b) Improving investigations. Education in Science, November 1999.
Watson J R, Goldsworthy A and Wood-Robinson V (2001) Sc1: beyond the fair test. In (Eds) Sears J and Sorensen P, Issues in science teaching, London, UK: Routledge Farmer.
Welford G, Harlen W and Schofield B (1985) Practical testing at Ages 11, 13 and 15. London, UK: Department of Education and Science.