Publication details for Prof Richard GottTytler, R., Duggan, S. & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and Science Education. International Journal of Science Education 23(8): 815-832.
- Publication type: Journal papers: academic
- ISSN/ISBN: 0950-0693, 1464-5289
- DOI: 10.1080/09500690010016058
- Keywords: Scientific evidence, Data.
- View online: Online version
- Durham research online: DRO record
Author(s) from Durham
This paper explores the nature and type of evidence employed by participants in an issue of public concern. By examining documents and interviewing members of the public involved in the debate, the way in which evidence was used in the arguments for and against the issue was determined. Three dimensions of evidence emerged from the data: formal scientific evidence based on the data; informal evidence (e.g. common sense, personal experience) and wider issues which impinge on the evidence (e.g. environmental or legal concerns). In this particular controversy, it was the questioning of the formal evidence by local scientists which became the 'magic bullet' but pertinent questioning by local non-scientists also framed the debate. The authors suggest that school science curricula should include practice in questioning and manipulating different sorts of real data in a variety of ways so that pupils are equipped and empowered to tackle contemporary issues of this kind.
Adelman, C., Jenkins, D. and Kemmis, S. (1976) Rethinking case study: notes from the
second Cambridge conference. Cambridge Journal of Education, 6(3), 139-150.
Brown, S. and McIntyre, D. (1993) Making Sense of Teaching (Buckingham: Open
Donnelly, J. F., Buchan, A. S., Jenkins, E.W. andWelford, A. G. (1994) Investigations in
Science Education Policy. Sc1 in the National Curriculum for England and Wales
(Leeds: University of Leeds).
Duggan, S., R. Gott, R., Lubben, F. and Millar, R. (1996) Evidence in science education.
In M. Hughes (ed.) Teaching and Learning in Changing Times (Blackwell, Oxford,
Epstein, S. (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of
credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(4),
Goshorn, K. (1996) Social rationality, risk, and the right to know: information
leveraging with the Toxic Release Inventory. Public Understanding of Science, 5,
Gott, R. and Duggan, S. (1995) Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum (Milton
Keynes: Open University Press).
Gott, R. and Duggan, S. (1996) Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in
science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 791-806.
Gott, R., Duggan, S. and Roberts, R. (1999) Understanding scientific evidence. Available:
Gott, R., Duggan, S. and Johnson, P. (1999) What do practising applied scientists do and
what are the implications for science education? Research in Science and Technology
Education, 17(1), 97-107.
Gott, R., Foulds, K. and Johnson, P. (1997) Science Investigations, book 1 (London:
Gott, R., Foulds, K. and Jones, M. (1998) Science Investigations, book 2 (London: Collins
Gott, R., Foulds, K. and Roberts, R. (1999) Science Investigations, book 3 (London:
House of Commons Environment Committee (1997a) Third Report: The Environmental
Impact of Cement Manufacture (London: Government Stationery Office).
House of Commons Environment Committee (1997b) The Environmental Impact of Cement
Manufacture: Minutes of Evidence (London: Government Stationery Office).
Irwin, A. andWynne, B. (eds) (1996)Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of
Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Johnson, P. M. and Gott, R. (1996) Constructivism and evidence from children’s ideas.
Science Education, 80(5), 561-577.
Layton, D. (1991) Science education and praxis: the relationship of school science to
practical action. Studies in Science Education, 19, 43-79.
Layton, D. (1993) Technology’s Challenge to Science Education (Milton Keynes: Open
Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S. and Davey, A. (1993) Inarticulate Science?
Perspectives on the Public Understanding of Science and Some implications for Science
Education (Driffield: Studies in Education).
Leach, J, Driver, R, Millar, R. and Scott, P. (1997) A study of progression in learning
about ‘the nature of science’: Issues of conceptualization and methodology.
International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 147-166.
Merriam, S. (1988) Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach (San
Millar, R. and Wynne, B. (1988) Public understanding of science: from contents to processes.
International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 388-398.
Millar, R. (1997) Science education for democracy: what can the school curriculum
achieve? In R. Levinson and J. Thomas (eds) Science Today: Problem or Crisis?
(London: Routledge), 87-101.
DIMENSIONS OF EVIDENCE 831
Plein, L. C. (1991) Popularizing biotechnology: the influence of issue definition. Science,
Technology & Human Values, 16(4), 474-490.
Shamos, M. (1995) The Myth of Scientific Literacy (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
Stake, R. (1978) The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Research, 7, 5-8.
Stake, R. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research (London: Sage).
Tripp, D. (1983) Co-authorship and negotiation: the interview as an act of creation.
Interchange, 14(3), 32-45.
Tytler, R. and Swatton, P. A. (1992) A critique of attainment target 1 based on case
studies of students’ investigations. School Science Review, 74(266), 21-35.
Wellington, J. (ed.) (1998) Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now? (London:
Wynne, B. (1991) Knowledges in context. Science, Technology& Human Values, 16(1), 111-
Wynne, B. (1996) Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of
science. In A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public
Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),