Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.

Durham European Law Institute

Publications

Publication details

E Spaventa (2009). Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos. European Law Review 35(6): 914-932.
  • Publication type: Journal papers: academic
  • ISSN/ISBN: 0307-5400
  • Keywords: EC law, Free movement of goods, Italy, Justification, Measures having equivalent effect, National legislation, Proportionality, Sweden.
  • View online: Online version
  • Durham research online: DRO record

Author(s) from Durham

Abstract

Contrasts the approach taken by the Advocates General and the European Court of Justice in Commission of the European Communities v Italy (C-110/05) and Aklagaren v Mickelsson (C-142/05) regarding the extent to which national rules restricting the use of goods were measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports. Considers whether the "certain selling arrangements" criterion laid down by the European Court of Justice in Criminal Proceedings against Keck (C-267/91) has been replaced by a market access test.

Durham European Law Institute